SummaryAnimals perform a remarkable diversity of movements through the coordinated mechanical contraction of skeletal muscle. This capacity for a wide range of movements is due to the presence of muscle cells with a very plastic phenotype that display many different biochemical, physiological and morphological properties. What factors influence the maintenance and plasticity of differentiated muscle fibers is a fundamental question in muscle biology. We have exploited the remarkable potential of skeletal muscle cells of the gymnotiform electric fish Sternopygus macrurus to trans-differentiate into electrocytes, the non-contractile electrogenic cells of the electric organ (EO), to investigate the mechanisms that regulate the skeletal muscle phenotype. In S. macrurus, mature electrocytes possess a phenotype that is intermediate between muscle and non-muscle cells. How some genes coding for muscle-specific proteins are downregulated while others are maintained, and novel genes are upregulated, is an intriguing problem in the control of skeletal muscle and EO phenotype. To date, the intracellular and extracellular factors that generate and maintain distinct patterns of gene expression in muscle and EO have not been defined. Expression studies in S. macrurus have started to shed light on the role that transcriptional and post-transcriptional events play in regulating specific muscle protein systems and the muscle phenotype of the EO. In addition, these findings also represent an important step toward identifying mechanisms that affect the maintenance and plasticity of the muscle cell phenotype for the evolution of highly specialized non-contractile tissues.Key words: electrocyte, muscle-derived cells, muscle regulatory factors, post-transcriptional regulation. (Arnold and Braun, 1996; Buckingham, 1992;Olson, 1990;Pownall et al., 2002;Weintraub et al., 1991). MRFs have been described as 'master' regulators of the muscle phenotype because of their potential to turn on the myogenic program following their forced expression in a variety of non-muscle cell types (Braun et al., 1989; Braun et al., 1990; Choi et al., 1990; Davis et al., 1987; Edmondson and Olson, 1989;Hopwood and Gurdon, 1990;Hopwood et al., 1991;Ishibashi et al., 2005;Kocaefe et al., 2005;Miner and Wold, 1990;Rhodes and Konieczny, 1989;Santerre et al., 1993;Weintraub et al., 1989;Weintraub et al., 1991). Gene knockout animals further demonstrate that MRFs are important for skeletal muscle development (Braun et al., 1992; Braun et al., 1994;Hasty et al., 1993;Nabeshima et al., 1993;Rudnicki et al., 1992;Rudnicki et al., 1993;Venuti et al., 1995). These genetic studies support the broadly accepted idea that expression of MRFs is essential for a cell to fully activate the skeletal muscle program. However, other studies have shown that expression of MRFs alone is not enough to fully establish the myogenic program. For one, myogenic conversion of cells in culture requires permissive conditions such as the absence of growth factors (Braun et al., 1989; Brune...