2011
DOI: 10.1049/el.2011.2158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sketch-based 3D model retrieval using compressive sensing classification

Abstract: A sketch-based 3D model retrieval methodology by using compressive sensing (CS) is presented. The approach to search and automatically return a set of 3D mesh models from a large database consists of histogram of oriented gradient feature extraction from projected images of 3D models, and CS based classification technique. Experimental results show that the proposed 3D model retrieval is very efficient to search for the 3D models from user-drawn sketches including the variation of shape, pose, and view-points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first-tier measure is a well-known measure defined as the percentage of correctly retrieved objects within the top k retrieved objects in the respective query class, where k is the total number of relevant objects (i.e., the size of the query class). Figure 7 shows a comparison of the firsttier precision of our approach against the performance of the HELO in [36] and STELA descriptor as reported in [37], as well as the suggestive contour features without sparse coding representation and compressive sensing based classification as reported in [42]. Sparse coding-based feature optimization provides for improved first-tier precision in 8 of the 13 total classes, with significant improvements in some classes yielding up to 20 percentage points.…”
Section: Comparison Of Retrieval Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first-tier measure is a well-known measure defined as the percentage of correctly retrieved objects within the top k retrieved objects in the respective query class, where k is the total number of relevant objects (i.e., the size of the query class). Figure 7 shows a comparison of the firsttier precision of our approach against the performance of the HELO in [36] and STELA descriptor as reported in [37], as well as the suggestive contour features without sparse coding representation and compressive sensing based classification as reported in [42]. Sparse coding-based feature optimization provides for improved first-tier precision in 8 of the 13 total classes, with significant improvements in some classes yielding up to 20 percentage points.…”
Section: Comparison Of Retrieval Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…We conducted experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method as compared to two alternative retrieval methods [36,37] and one alternative coding approach [42]. We discuss the obtained results in three parts: the experimental setup in Section 4.1; the retrieval results from representative sketched query images by numerous users in Section 4.2; and comparison of our method against state-of-the-art previous approaches in Section 4.3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then extract the suggestive contour [1], which is a robust estimate of the shape of the 3D model in a projected viewpoint, even if the surfaces of the 3D object are smooth. The suggestive contours are represented with a histogram of oriented gradients by analysing their properties in the topological space of diffusion tensor fields (HOG-DTFs) [2,3]. We need to optimise the HOG-DTF to remove noise and maintain the edges in order to robustly retrieve the 3D models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3 shows the comparison of first-tier precision between the DSR-based approach [7], the HOG-DTF feature-based 3D model retrieval approach presented in [2], and the our method based on sparse coding. Sparse coding-based feature optimisation provides better first-tier precision in eight of the 13 total classes, with the improvement in some classes yielding up to 20 percentage points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%