2015
DOI: 10.1080/14689367.2015.1085492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skew product cycles with rich dynamics: From totally non-hyperbolic dynamics to fully prevalent hyperbolicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that our definitions do not involved any transversality assumption (indeed in our context of a skew product such a transversality does not make sense, see also [6,Section 3] for more details on homoclinic relations for skew products). However, due to the fact that the maps f 0 and f 1 have no critical points, the homoclinic points behave as the transverse ones in the differentiable setting.…”
Section: Appendix a Transitivity And Homoclinic Relations Proof Of Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that our definitions do not involved any transversality assumption (indeed in our context of a skew product such a transversality does not make sense, see also [6,Section 3] for more details on homoclinic relations for skew products). However, due to the fact that the maps f 0 and f 1 have no critical points, the homoclinic points behave as the transverse ones in the differentiable setting.…”
Section: Appendix a Transitivity And Homoclinic Relations Proof Of Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following Lemma, whose proof is omitted here (for details [DER,Propositions 7.5 and 7.10]), assures that all points on Λ t \ {P, Q} have some iterate in ∆ t and associates an itinerary to each point of ∆ t having returns to ∆ t .…”
Section: Dynamics In a Neighborhood Of The Cycle Prove The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Proposition 5.1. To continue our discussion, we state a simple lemma about homoclinic relations which is just a reformulation of [20,Corollary 3.1] for the fixed points P and Q of F . For completeness and to illustrate the dynamics, we will sketch its proof.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constructions in [20] provide an explicit two-parameter family (with parameters a and t) of fiber maps f 0 = g a (concave) and f 1 = g 1,t (affine) such that the corresponding skew-product map Fa,t falls into one of the following cases, according to the choices of the parameters a and t:…”
Section: Illustration Of the Parabolic Case Ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%