1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00455041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skiaskopie mit und ohne Cycloplegie bei Kindern

Abstract: The refractive status of 100 eyes were measured by three ophthalmologists utilizing retinoscopy under non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions. The statistical analysis of the results was done by multiple regression. The retinoscopic measurements of sphere and cylinder of the three examiners show smaller differences under cycloplegic than under non-cycloplegic conditions. The largest differences in the measurements of axis were found in cases of small cylinder power. Especially in children and in patients wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cycloplegic refraction reveals the uncorrected refractive status; accommodation is avoided. Cycloplegic status must be considered when correcting refractive errors in children and young adults with high hyperopia and accommodative esotropia [1, 2]. Also, myopia may be overestimated if cycloplegia is not considered [3, 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cycloplegic refraction reveals the uncorrected refractive status; accommodation is avoided. Cycloplegic status must be considered when correcting refractive errors in children and young adults with high hyperopia and accommodative esotropia [1, 2]. Also, myopia may be overestimated if cycloplegia is not considered [3, 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fine correction of refractive errors, cycloplegia is necessary, particularly in young children and patients with fully accommodative esotropia or high hyperopia requiring greater accommodative efforts [12]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects, ranging in age from 6 to 12 years, were checked for refractive errors1 [6], motility problems, foveal fixation, binocularity (Randot and Titmus test) and the presence or absence of nystagmus.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%