Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care

Abstract

BackgroundGeneral practice is currently facing a significant workforce challenge. Changing the general practice skill mix by introducing new non-medical roles is recommended as one solution; the literature highlights that organisational and/or operational difficulties are associated with skill-mix changes.AimTo compare how three non-medical roles were being established in general practice, understand common implementation barriers, and identify measurable impacts or unintended consequences.Design and settingIn-depth qualitative comparison of three role initiatives in general practices in one area of Greater Manchester, England; that is, advanced practitioner and physician associate training schemes, and a locally commissioned practice pharmacist service.MethodSemi-structured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of stakeholders involved in the implementation of each role initiative were conducted. Template analysis enabled the production of pre-determined and researcher-generated codes, categories, and themes.ResultsThe final sample contained 38 stakeholders comprising training/service leads, role holders, and host practice staff. Three key themes captured participants’ perspectives: purpose and place of new roles in general practice, involving unclear role definition and tension at professional boundaries; transition of new roles into general practice, involving risk management, closing training–practice gaps and managing expectations; and future of new roles in general practice, involving demonstrating impact and questions about sustainability.ConclusionThis in-depth, in-context comparative study highlights that introducing new roles to general practice is not a simple process. Recognition of factors affecting the assimilation of roles may help to better align them with the goals of general practice and harness the commitment of individual practices to enable role sustainability.

Advanced Clinical Practitioners in Primary Care in the UK: A Qualitative Study of Workforce Transformation

“…The data from this project suggests that, in the geographical region where the evaluation was carried out, there appeared to be a widespread acceptance of, and appreciation for, the ACP role. This is in contrast to many studies that highlight professional boundary tensions and role conflicts (both between GPs and ACPs as well as between practice nurses and ACPs) [ 38 , 39 , 57 ]. A few respondents noted some initial apprehension from GPs about the ACP role, but this was represented as a historical issue.…”

Implementing post-discharge care following acute kidney injury in England: a single-centre qualitative evaluation

“… 42–45 However, resonating with other recent research, we also identified frustrations and lack of clarity around pharmacists’ roles, with limited opportunity to conduct face to face medication reviews. 46 47 …”

The advanced clinical practice pharmacy role and its implementation to practice in England

“…Often a cause of confusion among patients and HCPs alike, many authors report that the historic ambiguity of ACP role and scope of practice is finally becoming clearer with the introduction of a national framework and definition (Pearce & Breen, 2018). There is a consistent opinion that the HEE framework is a much-needed approach to understand, recognise, and standardise ACP, which is often cited as a challenge when implementing such a role (Wright et al, 2018;Nelson et al, 2019). Considering past national healthcare policies highlighted the same issues as today, these developments may be the positive step towards the greater success of an ACP role.…”