Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
INTRODUCTION Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain accompanied by reduced levels of physical activity and associated comorbidities such as overweight and obesity which have been associated to sarcopenia development. The aim of this systematic review is to ascertain whether Europeans with fibromyalgia show a reduction in sarcopenia determinants compared to apparently-healthy controls and to determine the risk of sarcopenia and its possible risk factors (PROSPERO: CRD42023439839). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Systematic searches were conducted on six databases (Academic-Search-Ultimate, CENTRAL, PubMed, SciELO, WOS-Core Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov last-search February-2024) looking for original studies developed in European countries which assessed any of the sarcopenia determinants proposed by the EWGSOP2-guidelines (handgrip strength, five sit-to-stand, appendicular skeletal mass [ASM], skeletal muscle index [SMI]) and included fibromyalgia and healthy-control individuals. Studies mixing fibromyalgia with other diagnoses were excluded. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to analyze possible differences and associated risk factors. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane-Rob tool and the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Studies, and the certainty of the evidence using GRADE-approach. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 25 studies (6393 individuals; 97% women; 20-65 years) were included. Fibromyalgia individuals showed reduced muscle strength ([handgrip] SMD: -1.16 [-1.29, -1.03]; high-certainty; [five sit-to-stand] not-assessed) and muscle quantity ([ASM] mean-difference: -0.83 kg [-1.41, -0.37]; [SMI] mean-difference: -0.26 kg/m 2 [-0.41, -0.10]; both low-certainty) compared to healthy-controls. Fibromyalgia individuals had nine-times greater risk for probable sarcopenia (OR: 9.23 [6.85, 12.45]; high-certainty), but not for confirmed sarcopenia ([ASM] OR: 0.91 [0.49, 1.67]; [SMI] OR: 0.67 [0.19, 2.33]; both low-certainty) according to the EWGSOP2 cut-off points. Reduced muscle strength was strongly associated to fibromyalgia-severity (β=-0.953 [-0.069, -0.038]). Studies were rated as high-risk of bias overall because did not account for some potential confounders (physical activity, sedentary time, Body Mass Index) which could influence the estimated effect. CONCLUSIONS Europeans with fibromyalgia have a large reduction in muscle strength and may have a reduction in muscle quantity. The risk of probable sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2 cut-off points was nine-times higher, but may have no difference in risk of reduced muscle quantity relative to healthy-controls. Muscle strength was strongly associated to disease severity.
INTRODUCTION Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain accompanied by reduced levels of physical activity and associated comorbidities such as overweight and obesity which have been associated to sarcopenia development. The aim of this systematic review is to ascertain whether Europeans with fibromyalgia show a reduction in sarcopenia determinants compared to apparently-healthy controls and to determine the risk of sarcopenia and its possible risk factors (PROSPERO: CRD42023439839). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Systematic searches were conducted on six databases (Academic-Search-Ultimate, CENTRAL, PubMed, SciELO, WOS-Core Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov last-search February-2024) looking for original studies developed in European countries which assessed any of the sarcopenia determinants proposed by the EWGSOP2-guidelines (handgrip strength, five sit-to-stand, appendicular skeletal mass [ASM], skeletal muscle index [SMI]) and included fibromyalgia and healthy-control individuals. Studies mixing fibromyalgia with other diagnoses were excluded. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to analyze possible differences and associated risk factors. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane-Rob tool and the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Studies, and the certainty of the evidence using GRADE-approach. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 25 studies (6393 individuals; 97% women; 20-65 years) were included. Fibromyalgia individuals showed reduced muscle strength ([handgrip] SMD: -1.16 [-1.29, -1.03]; high-certainty; [five sit-to-stand] not-assessed) and muscle quantity ([ASM] mean-difference: -0.83 kg [-1.41, -0.37]; [SMI] mean-difference: -0.26 kg/m 2 [-0.41, -0.10]; both low-certainty) compared to healthy-controls. Fibromyalgia individuals had nine-times greater risk for probable sarcopenia (OR: 9.23 [6.85, 12.45]; high-certainty), but not for confirmed sarcopenia ([ASM] OR: 0.91 [0.49, 1.67]; [SMI] OR: 0.67 [0.19, 2.33]; both low-certainty) according to the EWGSOP2 cut-off points. Reduced muscle strength was strongly associated to fibromyalgia-severity (β=-0.953 [-0.069, -0.038]). Studies were rated as high-risk of bias overall because did not account for some potential confounders (physical activity, sedentary time, Body Mass Index) which could influence the estimated effect. CONCLUSIONS Europeans with fibromyalgia have a large reduction in muscle strength and may have a reduction in muscle quantity. The risk of probable sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2 cut-off points was nine-times higher, but may have no difference in risk of reduced muscle quantity relative to healthy-controls. Muscle strength was strongly associated to disease severity.
Background: Evidence suggests that aerobic training with blood flow restriction is beneficial for treating fibromyalgia. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and effects of an aerobic training program with blood flow restriction for women with fibromyalgia. Methods: Thirty-seven women with fibromyalgia were included, and thirteen with an average age of 59 ± 3, a BMI of 26 ± 3, and who were polymedicated started the intervention period. The intervention group performed aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction using occlusive bands placed in the upper part of the rectus femoris, with a total duration of 14 min of restriction divided into two periods of 7 min with a rest period of 3 min and a total session duration of 17 min. Pressure intensity was measured using the visual pain scale (VAS), scoring 7 out of 10 (n = 7). The non-intervention group performed aerobic exercise without restriction of blood flow for the same periods, rest periods, and total duration of the session (n = 6). The intervention included 2 weekly sessions with 72 h between aerobic walking for 9 weeks. Walking was measured individually using the rating of perceived exertion scale (RPE) with an intensity between 6 and 7 out of 10. Visual and verbal support for the VAS and RPE scale was always provided throughout the sessions supervised by the investigator. Functional capacity was assessed using tests (six-minute walk test, incremental shuttle walk test, knee extension and handgrip test by dynamometer, 30 s chair stand test, and timed up-and-go test). Symptomatology was assessed using questionnaires (Widespread Pain Index, Symptom Severity Score, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), and blood samples were collected. Results: There were no adverse effects, and only one participant in the intervention group withdrew. Between-group and intragroup differences showed that the intervention group obtained improvements in the functional tests; CST p = 0.005; 6MWT p = 0.011; Handgrip p = 0.002; TUGT p = 0.002 with reduced impact of the disease according to the questionnaires; FIQ Stiffness p = 0.027 compared with the nonintervention group. Biochemical results remained within normal ranges in both groups. Conclusions: Blood flow-restricted aerobic training may be feasible, safe, and more effective than unrestricted aerobic training as a physical exercise prescription tool to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance, and stiffness in women with fibromyalgia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.