1991
DOI: 10.2514/3.10786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin-friction measurements and computational comparison of swept shock/boundary-layer interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although measurements of surface pressure, skin friction, 3 and surface behavior 4 have all led to a greater understanding of these interactions, the structure of the interaction flowfield has been comparatively poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although measurements of surface pressure, skin friction, 3 and surface behavior 4 have all led to a greater understanding of these interactions, the structure of the interaction flowfield has been comparatively poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 14. Experimental data of Zheltovodov et al [143,154] and Kim et al [158] is available for Cases 1,3 and 2, respectively. The computations were performed at the same flow conditions as the experiment.…”
Section: Advances In Cfd Prediction Of Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knight [157] concluded that the pitot pressure, yaw angle and surface pressure are predictable with reasonable accuracy using algebraic or two-equation turbulence models, however the surface heat transfer is not accurately predicted in strong interactions. In the particular case of the sharp-fin/plate configuration, Kim et al [158] have performed a joint experimental and computational study of skin friction in weak-to-strong interactions at M ∞ = 3 and 4. In their Navier-Stokes calculations they tested algebraic turbulence models and the k− model, integrated to the wall or employing the wall-function technique.…”
Section: Advances In Cfd Prediction Of Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the nature of strong non-equilibrium flow in 3D SWTBLI, especially when the state of the reverse flow could possibly change during the process, numerical simulation based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations with standard turbulence models is not very reliable for this kind of flow. [3,[21][22][23] Panaras [24,25] has pointed out the inadequacy of the Boussinesq's equation in predicting strong cross-flow separation generated in the fin/plate configuration. Reviews of numerical predictions of 3D SWTBLIs with existing turbulence models were recently carried out by Knight et al [3] , Zheltovodov and Knight [20] , and Panaras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%