2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/685/1/012003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skyscape Archaeology: an emerging interdiscipline for archaeoastronomers and archaeologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary method in archaeoastronomy for claimed alignments is the statistical analysis of large data sets (Henty, 2016). Reliance on such an approach is not suitable for single sites and, it is argued, precludes any interpretive ability (Sims, 2012).…”
Section: Methodical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The primary method in archaeoastronomy for claimed alignments is the statistical analysis of large data sets (Henty, 2016). Reliance on such an approach is not suitable for single sites and, it is argued, precludes any interpretive ability (Sims, 2012).…”
Section: Methodical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliance on such an approach is not suitable for single sites and, it is argued, precludes any interpretive ability (Sims, 2012). However, a method, referred to as skyscape archaeology (Henty, 2016;Silva, 2014), has recently been developed which considers the role and importance of 'additional artefactual evidence, the site or sites' location within a particular ritual landscape, related ethnographic evidence and relative dating' (Henty, 2016, p. 685). It also takes into account the oral tradition of folktales.…”
Section: Methodical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is also a long tradition of neglect or disapproval regarding archaeoastronomy by archaeologists in Britain (Hutton, 2022, p. 315) where archaeology is not considered a scientific discipline but a branch of the humanities. Here, archaeological investigations generally ignore both the sky (Henty, 2016) and archaeoastronomy (Ruggles, 1999, p. vii) which is not regarded as a useful subsidiary of archaeology (Polcaro, 2016, p. 1). Moreover, the purely humanistic training of the 'vast majority of archaeologists (especially in Europe) makes it difficult for them to consider as conclusive the evidence that archaeoastronomers present in support of their arguments.'…”
Section: General Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%