2010
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.2.000773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLA-Aware Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation for QoS in EPONs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [12], the proposal introduces an approach called cyclicpolling-based dynamic bandwidth allocation with service level agreements (CPBA-SLA) based on a two-layer allocation scheme: SLA-layer and ONU-layer. In the SLA-layer allocation, ONUs are distributed on two or more groups based on their SLA parameters.…”
Section: Upstream Bandwidth Alloaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], the proposal introduces an approach called cyclicpolling-based dynamic bandwidth allocation with service level agreements (CPBA-SLA) based on a two-layer allocation scheme: SLA-layer and ONU-layer. In the SLA-layer allocation, ONUs are distributed on two or more groups based on their SLA parameters.…”
Section: Upstream Bandwidth Alloaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the delay of various traffic classes should be load independent. The algorithms must impart a centralized delay distribution to the traffic classes, where the delay for a complete range of load is identically distributed [6]. Also, as the delay and the jitter needed is very much dependent on the application of the user, the users must be served according to the QoS parameter needed which is referred as the Parameterized QoS control (PQoS) [7].…”
Section: Keeping Required Delay Variation (Jitter) Bound -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online approaches such as IPACT achieve a high throughput but have a variable cycle time. The variable cycle time leads to variable packet delays or high jitter and is not suitable for the high-priority jitter-sensitive applications [6,12].…”
Section: A Online Vs Offline Qos Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations