2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12186-9_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLA Contract for Cross-Layer Monitoring and Adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Tao et al, 2014) proposed a novel hybrid and adaptive multi learners approach for online QoS modeling in the cloud; they described an adaptive solution that dynamically selects the best learning algorithm for prediction (Leitner et al, 2011). The proposals in (Fugini et al 2010) and (Schmieders et al, 2011) address the problem of violation detection and adaptation of SLA contracts between several layers. For example, (Fugini et al, 2010) proposed a methodology to create, monitor and adapt the inter-layer SLA contracts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (Tao et al, 2014) proposed a novel hybrid and adaptive multi learners approach for online QoS modeling in the cloud; they described an adaptive solution that dynamically selects the best learning algorithm for prediction (Leitner et al, 2011). The proposals in (Fugini et al 2010) and (Schmieders et al, 2011) address the problem of violation detection and adaptation of SLA contracts between several layers. For example, (Fugini et al, 2010) proposed a methodology to create, monitor and adapt the inter-layer SLA contracts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposals in (Fugini et al 2010) and (Schmieders et al, 2011) address the problem of violation detection and adaptation of SLA contracts between several layers. For example, (Fugini et al, 2010) proposed a methodology to create, monitor and adapt the inter-layer SLA contracts. The SLA model includes parameters such as KPI (key performance indicators), KGI (indicators key objectives), and metrics infrastructure.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latest research has focused on SLAs for CLAM. More particularly, Fugini et al [4] describe an SLA contract that comprises parameters from user goals, business service and IT infrastructure for CLAM of SBAs. Schmieders et al [11] propose the combination of SLA prediction, which uses assumptions about the characteristics of the execution context, and cross-layer adaptation mechanisms for preventing SLA violations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, we are aware only of one recent work that is related to the definition of SLAs for CLAM [4]. Although this work describes a methodology for creating SLAs, it focuses on the dependencies between the characteristics of services, and it does not follow the SBA layers as they have been defined in [9,6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its main limitations are that it does not comprise infrastructure monitoring unlike SI adaptation and that the proposed adaptation process is not proactive. [Fugini and Siadat 2009] proposes a SLA contract that merges parameters from user, business service and IT infrastructure as an alternative approach for the cross-layer monitoring and adaptation of SBAs. The user parameters are measured through the Key Goal Indicators (KGIs) that define how well service-based processes achieve the customers' goals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%