2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2019.8794369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLAMBench 3.0: Systematic Automated Reproducible Evaluation of SLAM Systems for Robot Vision Challenges and Scene Understanding

Abstract: The first two authors have equal contribution, the order just reflects alphabetical order.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate a fusion model, it is necessary to establish an evaluation method for a multi-modal sensor fusion model [ 145 ]. In spite of several mature evaluation methods, such as the Monte Carlo strategy, real-time simulation, and individual calculation in the specific applications, and some SLAM evaluation methods, for instance relative pose error (RPE) [ 146 ], absolute trajectory error (ATE) [ 146 ], etc., they are not suitable to evaluate the performance of each sensor in the whole fusion system.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate a fusion model, it is necessary to establish an evaluation method for a multi-modal sensor fusion model [ 145 ]. In spite of several mature evaluation methods, such as the Monte Carlo strategy, real-time simulation, and individual calculation in the specific applications, and some SLAM evaluation methods, for instance relative pose error (RPE) [ 146 ], absolute trajectory error (ATE) [ 146 ], etc., they are not suitable to evaluate the performance of each sensor in the whole fusion system.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future, we plan to apply the metric to other SLAM datasets, so the that developers can selectively work with trajectories with known difficulty levels. We also plan to add the metric to SLAMBench3.0 [4], and extended the metric to support multi-robot trajectories [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SLAMBench, a SLAM algorithm (specifically KinectFusion [2]) is measured in terms of both accuracy and computational cost across a range of processor platforms and using different language implementations. In SLAMBench2.0 [3] and SLAMBench3.0 [4], more SLAM algorithms are supported by a SLAM API and an I/O system. Similar benchmarking works have been performed in [5] and [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate our implementation using the SLAMBench framework [3] [4]. All experiments were performed on a machine with an Intel Core i7-6700HQ CPU with 16GB of memory, and an NVidia GeForce GTX 960M with 4GB VRAM, running Ubuntu 18.04.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we see our work in the context of emerging technologies for benchmarking (e.g SLAMBench [4] and hyperparameter tuning (e.g HyperMapper [2]), which provide opportunities to tailor SLAM systems to suit specific applications. In this respect, FullFusion lays groundwork towards finding the right combination of systems for dynamic environments.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%