2016
DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2016-06-735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slaughterhouse survey of culled female camels (Camelus dromedarius) in southeast Algeria: Fetal wastage and pregnancy characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional and scientific methods for pregnancy testing in this study were not correlated. This explains the findings in other studies showing that 21% of animals culled are pregnant (Benaissa et al, 2016). Furthermore, the tail cocking method is reported to be accurate when the camels are in a calm environment, and when agitated they give false positives (Deen, 2008).…”
Section: Pregnancy Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The traditional and scientific methods for pregnancy testing in this study were not correlated. This explains the findings in other studies showing that 21% of animals culled are pregnant (Benaissa et al, 2016). Furthermore, the tail cocking method is reported to be accurate when the camels are in a calm environment, and when agitated they give false positives (Deen, 2008).…”
Section: Pregnancy Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This finding could indicate that different vascular patterns might be found in DCs, as observed also in the equine species [ 28 ]. A right uterine horn pregnancy cannot be excluded as being the reason for the different site of the UC attachment, but this hypothesis seems unlikely because Benaissa et al [ 29 ] observed only one right uterine horn pregnancy out of 198 DCs’ pregnant uteri examined at the slaughterhouse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the systematic collection of data and surveys, the frequency of foetal wastage in abattoirs has been ascertained, revealing that it is a common phenomenon. Numerous studies have been conducted in various countries, such as Nigeria (Nwakpu and Osakwe, 2007;Cadmus and Adesokan, 2010;Alhaji, 2011;Awoyomi et al, 2013;Alhaji et al, 2015;Iliyasu et al, 2015;Ngbede et al, 2017;Raimi et al, 2017;Adebowale et al, 2020;Usman et al, 2021, Zubair et al, 2022, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Mutwedu et al, 2019), Ethiopia (Urga and Yohanis, 2021), and Algeria (Benaissa, et al, 2016). To enhance the availability of nutritious animal protein, it is imperative to address the practise of slaughtering pregnant food animals in numerous developing countries (Maurer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foetal wastage occurring in abattoirs can be attributed to various factors, such as indiscriminate slaughter of pregnant livestock (Fayemi and Muchenje, 2013), inadequate ante-mortem pregnancy screening methods (Urga et al, 2021), advanced age and suboptimal body condition (Benaissa et al, 2016), disease and stress (Adebowale et al, 2020), leading to the production of lowquality meat (Iliyasu et al, 2015). These factors contribute to a decline in the livestock population and low rates of herd replacement (Zubair et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%