2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep and sleep disordered breathing in children with down syndrome: Effects on behaviour, neurocognition and the cardiovascular system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, a meta-analysis indicated that TD children with SRBD have more attention deficit/hyperactivity symptomatology than do TD children who do not have SRBD [37]. Similar results have been reported for children with Down syndrome who have SRBD [38].…”
Section: Association Of Child Sleep Characteristics and Problems To Lsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…More generally, a meta-analysis indicated that TD children with SRBD have more attention deficit/hyperactivity symptomatology than do TD children who do not have SRBD [37]. Similar results have been reported for children with Down syndrome who have SRBD [38].…”
Section: Association Of Child Sleep Characteristics and Problems To Lsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…More generally, a meta-analysis indicated that TD children with SRBD have more attention de cit/hyperactivity symptomatology than do TD children who do not have SRBD [39]. Similar results have been reported for children with Down syndrome who have SRBD [40].…”
Section: Association Of Child Sleep Characteristics and Problems To Lsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Moreover, the location of the upper airway stenosis is similar to the results of many previous studies 19,20 . Previous research has confirmed that OSHAS is highly correlated with the occurrence and development of hypertension and vascular endothelial function injury 21,22 . However, the effect of HIF-1α expression on cardiovascular function in patients with OSHAS is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%