“…17 Subjective measures are often inexpensive, easily administered, and provide detailed descriptions of sleep characteristics, whereas objective measures such as actigraphy can provide additional impartial information about sleep quality. 17 A recent systematic review 12 found that, since 1987 (ie, the year in which the official diagnosis of CFS/ME was first published), only 6 studies have investigated sleep in children and adolescents younger than 19 years with a diagnosis of CFS/ ME. The studies are characterized by wide variation with respect to the inclusion criteria employed (ie, some have used different case definitions of CFS/ME), sample size (ie, ranging from n = 3 to n = 57), 12 method used to assess sleep (ie, actigraphy, polysomnography, core body temperature, sleep/wake diary), sleep outcomes (ie, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency), time frame of data collection (ie, polysomnography for 1 night, actigraphy for 2 weeks), and the investigation of biological factors that potentially underlie sleep disturbances (ie, core body temperature, cortisol levels, melatonin levels).…”