Introduction:A number of studies have shown a U-shaped association between sleep duration and mortality. Since sleep duration is partly genetically determined, it seems likely that its association with mortality is also genetically influenced. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence on heredity on the association between sleep duration and mortality. Methods: We used a cohort of 14 267 twins from the Swedish Twin Registry. Results: A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusted for a number of covariates, confirmed a clear U shape with a hazard ratio (HR) = 1.34 and 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-1.57 for a sleep duration of ≤6.5 hours and HR = 1.18 (CI = 1.07-1.30) for sleep of ≥9.5 hours. Reference value was 7.0 hours. A co-twin analysis of 1942 twins discordant on mortality showed a HR = 2.66 (CI = 1.17-6.04) for long (≥9.5 hours) sleep in monzygotic twins and an HR = 0.66 (CI = 0.20-2.14) for short (<6.5 hours) sleep. In dizygotic twins, no association was significant. The heritability for mortality was 28% for the whole group, while it was 86% for short sleepers and 42% for long sleepers. Thus, the link with mortality for long sleep appears to be more due to environmental factors than to heredity, while heritability dominates among short sleepers. Conclusions: We found that both long and short sleep were associated with higher total mortality, that the difference in mortality within twin pairs is associated with long sleep, and that short sleep has a higher heritability for mortality, while long sleep is associated with more environmental influences on mortality. Keywords: CVD, cancer, sleep duration, TST, sleep quality, snoring.
INTRODUCTIONOne of the most common questions concerning sleep is: "how much should we sleep?" Several systematic reviews on sleep duration and mortality have found that the optimal sleep duration is 7 hours, with a significant increase of overall mortality for individuals with short (≤6 hours) or long (≥8 hours) sleep.
1-3In a critical review, Kurina et al. 4 argue that results from the literature are not totally consistent. The analysis of Kurina et al. included 42 studies and only 14 of these showed a U-shaped relationship, while 23 studies (43%) showed no association at all, and the remainder showed associations for either short or long sleep. Their main arguments against the presence of a U-shaped association between sleep and mortality are the heterogeneity in the measurement of sleep duration and in its categorization, the use of different methods and variables for adjusting for potential confounders across studies, and different age ranges. In a study focusing on age, we found that the association between sleep duration and mortality was stronger in young age groups than in older individuals, but the effect was significant for those of 70 years of age and below (Akerstedt et al., subm).One weakness with prior studies is that the exposure variable in most cases has asked for "usual sleep duration" or some similar phrasing. This may in...