2018
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep quality and noise: comparisons between hospital and home settings

Abstract: Children and their mothers have poor quality sleep in paediatric wards. This may affect the child's behaviour, recovery and pain tolerance. Sleep deprivation adds to parental burden and stress. Sound levels are significantly raised in hospital and may contribute to poor sleep. Reduction in the level of noise might lead to an improvement in sleep, affecting the quality of stay of both parent and child.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
45
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some conflicting findings about parents' sleep quality in the hospitals (Table ). In six of the studies, the parents reported poor sleep quality and disrupted and fragmented sleep during the hospitalisation (Bevan et al, ; Franck et al, ; McCann, ; McLoone et al, ; Meltzer, Davis, et al, ; Nassery & Landgren, ; Stickland et al, ; Stremler et al, ). In one study, more than half of the parents reported good sleep quality in the paediatric ward despite nocturnal awakenings (Angelhoff et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some conflicting findings about parents' sleep quality in the hospitals (Table ). In six of the studies, the parents reported poor sleep quality and disrupted and fragmented sleep during the hospitalisation (Bevan et al, ; Franck et al, ; McCann, ; McLoone et al, ; Meltzer, Davis, et al, ; Nassery & Landgren, ; Stickland et al, ; Stremler et al, ). In one study, more than half of the parents reported good sleep quality in the paediatric ward despite nocturnal awakenings (Angelhoff et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also included in the aims of the studies was the documentation of physiological, psychological and situational factors affecting fatigue among mothers (Kim et al, 2017). Other aims were as follows: prevalence estimates of self-report sleep quantity and quality among parents accommodated on the paediatric oncology ward (McLoone et al, 2013), and descriptions and measurement of sleep quantity and sleep patterns (Bevan et al, 2019;Nassery & Landgren, 2018), and additionally, factors affecting the sleep of parents with critically ill children (Stremler et al, 2014;Stremler, Haddad, Pullenayegum, & Parshuram, 2017) as well as strategies used to improve parents' sleep (Stremler, Dhukai, Wong, & Parshuram, 2011). Finally, aims also included comparisons of sleep quality and quantity among the parents who were accommodated bedside at the hospital and those who slept at a Ronald McDonald House (Franck et al, 2014).…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was attributed to noise and light and ward schedules; parents stated that it challenged their emotional regulation and parent–child relationships. This was supported in 2018 in a study by Bevan et al () who examined total sleep time, sleep efficiency, median sound levels overnight in a children's hospital and compared them with those of a child's home environment. They found that children had on average 62.9 min, and parents 72.8 min, per night less sleep in hospital than at home; children and parents reported poorer sleep quality in hospital than at home; and the median sound levels measured for eight of 40 children both at home (34.7 dBA) and in hospital (48.6 dBA) exceeded World Health Organization recommendations of 30 dB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies in oncology and intensive care wards show that children and parents sleep poorly in hospital. A Southampton study compared the sleep of children and their parents in hospital with sleep at home . Total sleep time and sleep efficiency (percentage of minutes asleep from onset to waking) were assessed using an actigraph wrist watch worn for up to five consecutive days both at home and in hospital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%