Chronic whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) represents a considerable burden, with an estimated 50% of individuals with acute whiplash developing chronic or persistent problems.2 Chronic whiplash is also notoriously resistant to conventional therapies. 27 One possible approach to mitigating the burden of chronic whiplash is to prevent its development altogether. Early evidence from trials in whiplash and low back pain suggests that identifying and targeting specific risk factors may be a more efficient approach to preventing chronicity than standardized protocols.
19,25While there is a growing body of evidence supporting the identification and treatment of psychosocial or lab-based physical risk factors in the acute stage of injury, 10,21,25,30 less work has been dedicated to identifying simple clinic-based physical indicators of risk.Tissue injury or inflammation leads to sensitization of peripheral nociceptors.
31Clinically, this sensitization manifests as an exaggerated pain response to a normally noxious stimulus when applied over the injured tissue, a phenomenon termed "hyperalgesia."13 In some cases, the pressure sensitivity can extend beyond the local zone of injury, which is termed "secondary hyperalgesia." Occasionally, hyperalgesia exists in anatomical areas remote from the injured area.
24This widespread sensory hypersensitivity is thought to be a result of altered processing of nociceptive information at the level of the spinal cord or higher centers, and is associated with poor recovery from acute whiplash injury. 20,22 This would suggest that the diagnosis of local and distal hypersensitivity has potential use T T STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional convenience sample.
T T OBJECTIVES:To describe the distribution of scores for pressure pain threshold (PPT) at 2 standardized testing sites in people with neck pain of less than 90 days' duration: the angle of the upper trapezius and the belly of the tibialis anterior. A secondary objective was to identify important influences on PPT.
T T BACKGROUND:PPT may be a valuable assessment and prognostic indicator for people with neck pain. However, to facilitate interpretation of scores, knowledge of means and variance for the target population, as well as factors that might influence scores, is needed.
T T METHODS:Participants were recruited from community-based physiotherapy clinics and underwent PPT testing using a digital algometer and standardized protocol. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviations, quartiles, skewness, and kurtosis) were calculated for the 2 sites.Simple bivariate tests of association were conducted to explore potential moderators.
T T RESULTS:A positively skewed distribution was described for the 2 standardized sites. Significant moderators were sex (male higher than female), age (r = 0.22), and self-reported pain intensity (r = -0.24). Neither litigation status nor most symptomatic/least symptomatic side influenced PPT.
T T CONCLUSIONS:This manuscript presents information regarding the expected scores for PPT testing in people with ac...