2018
DOI: 10.1101/370965
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep selectively stabilizes contextual aspects of negative memories

Abstract: Sleep and emotion are both powerful modulators of the long-term stability of episodic memories, but precisely how these factors interact remains unresolved. We assessed changes in item recognition, contextual memory, and affective tone for negative and neutral memories across a 12 h interval containing sleep or wakefulness in 71 human volunteers. Our data indicate a sleep-dependent stabilization of negative contextual memories, in a way not seen for neutral memories, item recognition, or across wakefulness. Fu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we defined our sample size using a heuristic procedure (Lakens, 2022 ), which was based on reviewing the literature about sleep and emotional memory. Considering the 34 studies included in the meta‐analysis by Schäfer and colleagues 2020 ), the majority of the studies on this topic had a sample size between 12 participants per group or condition (Goldschmied et al, 2015 ; Wagner, Kashyap, Diekelmann, & Born, 2007 ) to 24 participants per group or condition (Ashton, Harrington, Smith, & Cairney, 2019 ), with some exceptions with a larger sample size (Baran et al, 2012 ; Bennion, Payne, & Kensinger, 2016 ; Cox et al, 2018 ). For example, Sopp, Michael, and Mecklinger ( 2018 ), using a similar protocol to ours (two groups, three testing periods, a recognition task with neutral and unpleasant stimuli), recruited 23 participants per group, similar to our sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we defined our sample size using a heuristic procedure (Lakens, 2022 ), which was based on reviewing the literature about sleep and emotional memory. Considering the 34 studies included in the meta‐analysis by Schäfer and colleagues 2020 ), the majority of the studies on this topic had a sample size between 12 participants per group or condition (Goldschmied et al, 2015 ; Wagner, Kashyap, Diekelmann, & Born, 2007 ) to 24 participants per group or condition (Ashton, Harrington, Smith, & Cairney, 2019 ), with some exceptions with a larger sample size (Baran et al, 2012 ; Bennion, Payne, & Kensinger, 2016 ; Cox et al, 2018 ). For example, Sopp, Michael, and Mecklinger ( 2018 ), using a similar protocol to ours (two groups, three testing periods, a recognition task with neutral and unpleasant stimuli), recruited 23 participants per group, similar to our sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016 ; Lehmann et al. 2016 ; Cox et al. 2018 ), it has remained unclear how these processes are implemented neurophysiologically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%