2014 22nd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iraniancee.2014.6999850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep spindle detection using modified extreme learning machine generalized radial basis function method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the DWPT-DFA method, the extracted features with different mother wavelets are fed into the SSVM classifier with the GRBF kernel. Regarding the previous studies [8,21,22,30] on the classifiers of NN, K-NN, SVM, RBF and GRBF in the EEG signal processing, we employ a SSVM with a GRBF for classifying the imagin ary movement features. The SSVM and GRBF are the amended algorithms of the traditional SVM and RBF to solve the limitations and add flexibility, such as the curse of dimension in the SVM, and to add flexibility to the RBF for different cases of data distribution [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the DWPT-DFA method, the extracted features with different mother wavelets are fed into the SSVM classifier with the GRBF kernel. Regarding the previous studies [8,21,22,30] on the classifiers of NN, K-NN, SVM, RBF and GRBF in the EEG signal processing, we employ a SSVM with a GRBF for classifying the imagin ary movement features. The SSVM and GRBF are the amended algorithms of the traditional SVM and RBF to solve the limitations and add flexibility, such as the curse of dimension in the SVM, and to add flexibility to the RBF for different cases of data distribution [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSVM and GRBF are the amended algorithms of the traditional SVM and RBF to solve the limitations and add flexibility, such as the curse of dimension in the SVM, and to add flexibility to the RBF for different cases of data distribution [8]. Based on our previous studies [22,30], the GRBF has the ability of covering the data distribution widely in the feature space, compared to the traditional RBF. The advantage of the SSVM classifier is preventing the algorithm from the curse of dimension by employing the Lagrange theorem, when the number of features is increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a classification study based on the BCI, Hoffmann et al [14] showed that the SVM with a RBF kernel has a greater impact on the classification accuracy than other kernels such as polynomial, linear and Sigmoid. In our previous studies [9,[11][12][13]24], the GRBF kernel has higher accuracy and robustness. The procedure of this study is: recording nine EEG data based on the BCI competition III, dataset IVa (the designed task is the same as the BCI Competition III dataset IVa task); implementing the existed DFBCSP-DSLVQ method; applying a frequency sub-band selection method to find the best sub-bands; using the KLDA and KPCA algorithms, in which the kernel is GRBF, to select the features; and finally utilizing different combinations to classify the selected features, namely the SVM with the radial basis function (RBF) kernel (SVM-RBF), SVM with the GRBF kernel (SVM-GRBF), soft margin support vector machine (SSVM) with the RBF kernel (SSVM-RBF), SSVM with the GRBF kernel (SSVM-GRBF), the NN, and the K-nearest neighbor (K-NN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%