1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00993817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleeping with the enemy: A dynamic model of declining political commitment in state socialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nee and Lian's (1994) opportunism model captures some features of an embourgeoisement process through which administrative and managerial cadres give up political commitments in order to catch opportunities in a growing marketplace. So (2003) argues that the statist society is the trademark of China's reforms and that only the cadres were in a historically strategic position to develop a capitalist economy.…”
Section: Positional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nee and Lian's (1994) opportunism model captures some features of an embourgeoisement process through which administrative and managerial cadres give up political commitments in order to catch opportunities in a growing marketplace. So (2003) argues that the statist society is the trademark of China's reforms and that only the cadres were in a historically strategic position to develop a capitalist economy.…”
Section: Positional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consensus has its roots not only in history but also in contemporary thought. Socialism centered on state ownership was once thought to be the key to higher rates of economic growth, but the competition between the socialist and the capitalist worlds provided decisive evidence that this version of socialism could not outperform capitalism (Nee and Lian 1994). The fast growth of the four East Asian Tigers was a particularly painful fact for the Chinese leadership to swallow.…”
Section: The Growth Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…

Urban elites and their relative income levels are windows on the emerging socioeconomic order in China. The most recent developments examine why political elites pursue market opportunities (Nee and Lian, 1994), how political and professional elites entail distinct pathways of career

Conducting a trend analysis with 1988 and 1995 national surveys of urban China, we found that political, administrative, and managerial elites maintained consistently higher levels of income relative to professional elites, but this applied mainly to a monopoly sector of industries that were restricted to state operation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%