2013
DOI: 10.4161/rna.27177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slicing tRNAs to boost functional ncRNA diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
222
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
4
222
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple explanation is the increased coverage with ultradeep sequencing methods and coverage of any cell type including tumors, many developmental stages, as well as (tumor) cell lines numerous times over (Carninci 2009;Ritz et al 2011;Haas et al 2012;Ho et al 2012;Shah et al 2012;Eswaran et al 2013;Hu et al 2013;Schonberg et al 2013;Yoshihara et al 2013). With all this overabundance, there is a debate raging between those that claim almost any identified transcript and snippet of RNA to be functional (Mattick 2003;Lee et al 2009;Carninci 2010;Kishore et al 2010;Clark et al 2011;Bernstein et al 2012;Kapranov and St Laurent 2012;Khayrullina et al 2012;Gebetsberger and Polacek 2013;Mattick and Dinger 2013) and more conservative voices (Brosius 2005c;Huttenhofer et al 2005;Robinson 2010;van Bakel et al 2010;Graur et al 2013). The writer concurs with the argumentation for spurious and stochastic transcripts (Kowalczyk et al 2012;Jensen et al 2013;Mudge et al 2013), especially as many transcription promoters are bidirectional (Seila et al 2008;Neil et al 2009;Xu et al 2009;Wei et al 2011;Uesaka et al 2014).…”
Section: Did Rna Enter Bubble Territory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple explanation is the increased coverage with ultradeep sequencing methods and coverage of any cell type including tumors, many developmental stages, as well as (tumor) cell lines numerous times over (Carninci 2009;Ritz et al 2011;Haas et al 2012;Ho et al 2012;Shah et al 2012;Eswaran et al 2013;Hu et al 2013;Schonberg et al 2013;Yoshihara et al 2013). With all this overabundance, there is a debate raging between those that claim almost any identified transcript and snippet of RNA to be functional (Mattick 2003;Lee et al 2009;Carninci 2010;Kishore et al 2010;Clark et al 2011;Bernstein et al 2012;Kapranov and St Laurent 2012;Khayrullina et al 2012;Gebetsberger and Polacek 2013;Mattick and Dinger 2013) and more conservative voices (Brosius 2005c;Huttenhofer et al 2005;Robinson 2010;van Bakel et al 2010;Graur et al 2013). The writer concurs with the argumentation for spurious and stochastic transcripts (Kowalczyk et al 2012;Jensen et al 2013;Mudge et al 2013), especially as many transcription promoters are bidirectional (Seila et al 2008;Neil et al 2009;Xu et al 2009;Wei et al 2011;Uesaka et al 2014).…”
Section: Did Rna Enter Bubble Territory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 tRNAs have further been reported to serve as a source of small functional RNAs. [12][13][14] Numerous tRNA-interacting proteins have recently been proposed, 15 indicating the scope of tRNA biological functions may be far beyond that previously assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many organisms, small RNAs are produced from mature tRNAs or their precursor transcripts not as random degradation products, but as functional molecules involved in many biological processes beyond translation (6)(7)(8). According to the proposed nomenclature (7), tRNA-derived small RNAs identified to date can be classified into two groups: tRNA halves and tRNA-derived fragments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%