2021
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2020362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding method for the semi-linear elliptic equations involving the uniformly elliptic nonlocal operators

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the uniformly elliptic nonlocal operators Aαu(x) = Cn,αP.V. R n a(x − y)(u(x) − u(y)) |x − y| n+α dy,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark It is worth noting that the De Giorgi‐type nonlinearity ffalse(ufalse)=uu3$$ f(u)=u-{u}^3 $$ satisfies condition (). Our assumption () is more general than those assumed in Berestycki‐Hamel‐Monneau, 36 Chen‐Bao‐Li, 37 Dipierro‐Soave‐Valdinoci, 29 Liu, 38 Qu‐Wu‐Zhang, 26 Wu‐Chen 39,40 for Laplacian normalΔ$$ -\Delta $$ and fractional Laplacian false(normalΔfalse)s$$ {\left(-\Delta \right)}^s $$, in which ffalse(·false)$$ f\left(\cdotp \right) $$ is required to be nonincreasing on false[1,1+δfalse]$$ \left[-1,-1+\delta \right] $$ and false[1δ,1false]$$ \left[1-\delta, 1\right] $$.…”
Section: Applications Of Maximum Principlesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark It is worth noting that the De Giorgi‐type nonlinearity ffalse(ufalse)=uu3$$ f(u)=u-{u}^3 $$ satisfies condition (). Our assumption () is more general than those assumed in Berestycki‐Hamel‐Monneau, 36 Chen‐Bao‐Li, 37 Dipierro‐Soave‐Valdinoci, 29 Liu, 38 Qu‐Wu‐Zhang, 26 Wu‐Chen 39,40 for Laplacian normalΔ$$ -\Delta $$ and fractional Laplacian false(normalΔfalse)s$$ {\left(-\Delta \right)}^s $$, in which ffalse(·false)$$ f\left(\cdotp \right) $$ is required to be nonincreasing on false[1,1+δfalse]$$ \left[-1,-1+\delta \right] $$ and false[1δ,1false]$$ \left[1-\delta, 1\right] $$.…”
Section: Applications Of Maximum Principlesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Proof of Theorem 3.5. Let T be any hyperplane, Σ be the half space on one side of the plane T. Set w(x) = u(x) − u(x) for all x ∈ Σ, where x is the reflection of x with respect to T. We define Σ + = {x ∈ Σ|w Our assumption (3.40) is more general than those assumed in Berestycki-Hamel-Monneau, 36 Chen-Bao-Li, 37 Dipierro-Soave-Valdinoci, 29 Liu, 38 Qu-Wu-Zhang, 26 Wu-Chen and hence, we can derive from Theorem 1.1 immediately that w 𝜆 * (x) = 0 almost everywhere in R N , which contradicts assumption (3.39). Thus, w 𝜆 (x) ∶= u(x 𝜆 ) − u(x) < 0 in Σ 𝜆 for all 𝜆 with |𝜆| > M.…”
Section: Theorem 35 (Liouville Theorem) Assume That Umentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang and Wang [12] have presented the nonexistence of the system involving the uniform elliptic operator. Recently, Qu et al [13] introduced the monotonicity of semilinear equations involving the uniform elliptic operator As$$ {A}_s $$ by the sliding method. Recently, Jiayan et al [14] presented the monotonicity of generalized Schrodinger equation involving the operator As$$ {A}_s $$ in a weaker condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we will adopt a sliding method to handle the uniformly parabolic fractional operators. As to the uniformly elliptic operators, we can refer to [19]. The sliding method was developed by Berestycki and Nirenberg [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%