2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding mode fault‐tolerant control of an octorotor using linear parameter varying‐based schemes

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents two fault tolerant control (FTC) schemes for an octorotor UAV. The FTC schemes are based on an LPV system representation and utilizes a combination of sliding mode ideas and control allocation in order to take full advantage of the available redundant rotors in the octorotor configuration. A detailed synthesis procedure for the design of the two FTC schemes in the presence of uncertainty, as well as faults/failures, is presented. The first scheme is based on an online control alloc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another work [20] suggests a fault-tolerant control strategy using cooperation between a radial based function neural network, fuzzy logic control and sliding mode control (SMC) technique in presence of actuator faults, to alleviate the chattering and to maintain good tracking of the system. In [21], two FTC schemes using linear parameter varying system representation, with a combination of SMC theory and control allocation, are developed and tested in the presence of uncertainty, as well as faults and failures. In the first scheme, the knowledge of the rotor effectiveness is required in order to apply an online control allocation methodology, and to redistribute the control signal to working motors, but in the second scheme this knowledge is not necessary.…”
Section: State Of the Art On Fault-tolerant Control For Uavs Through mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another work [20] suggests a fault-tolerant control strategy using cooperation between a radial based function neural network, fuzzy logic control and sliding mode control (SMC) technique in presence of actuator faults, to alleviate the chattering and to maintain good tracking of the system. In [21], two FTC schemes using linear parameter varying system representation, with a combination of SMC theory and control allocation, are developed and tested in the presence of uncertainty, as well as faults and failures. In the first scheme, the knowledge of the rotor effectiveness is required in order to apply an online control allocation methodology, and to redistribute the control signal to working motors, but in the second scheme this knowledge is not necessary.…”
Section: State Of the Art On Fault-tolerant Control For Uavs Through mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) is presented. This configuration was developed in [32] and will be used to test the FTC schemes, since it has many advantages over the star-shaped configuration [21] regarding stability and size factors. First, for design purposes, some assumptions are made:…”
Section: Octorotor Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTC schemes considering ISMC have been recently proposed for state feedback and output feedback in the literatures. [27][28][29] All these techniques require FDI scheme, wherein FDI scheme was used to estimate the effectiveness levels of the actuators because this information was explicitly used. Recently in Zhong et al, 30 an overview of the tilt rotor UAV was presented where the concept and some typical platforms while focusing on various control techniques is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fault tolerant control of this type of vehicles has been recently studied and different strategies have been proposed: Linear Parametric Varying-(LPV-) based sliding mode control allocation (7) , neural network interval type-2 fuzzy sliding mode controller (8) , integral sliding mode scheme combined with fixed control allocation (9) , and cascade inverse method of control allocation (10) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%