2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3162217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding-Window Forward Error Correction Based on Reference Order for Real-Time Video Streaming

Abstract: In real-time video streaming, data packets are transported over the network from a transmitter to a receiver. The quality of the received video fluctuates as the network conditions change, and it can degrade substantially when there is considerable packet loss. Forward error correction (FEC) techniques can be used to recover lost packets by incorporating redundant data. Conventional FEC schemes do not work well when scalable video coding (SVC) is adopted. In this paper, we propose a novel FEC scheme that overc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models that use Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) [14], Linear Optimizations [15], Online Bitrate Selection [16], Deep Learning Optimizations [17], cycle vector-quantized variational autoencoder (cycle-VQ-VAE) [18], Flexible Latency Aware Streaming (FLAS) [19], and Reinforcement Learning-Based Rate Adaptation (RLRA) [20], for dynamic control over streaming operations are discussed & evaluated under different scenarios. These models are further extended via the work in [21,22,23,24,25], which propose use of Shift-Tile-Tracking (STC), LSTM based streaming, scalable-high-efficiency-video-coding (SHVC) with device-to-device communications, Sliding-Window Forward Error Correction (SW FEC), and context-aware streaming, which enables real-time processing for different video types. Extended models that use Proactive Caching [26], and Video streaming based on super resolution [27] are also discussed, and are highly useful for a wide variety of real-time use cases.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Existing Streaming Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that use Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) [14], Linear Optimizations [15], Online Bitrate Selection [16], Deep Learning Optimizations [17], cycle vector-quantized variational autoencoder (cycle-VQ-VAE) [18], Flexible Latency Aware Streaming (FLAS) [19], and Reinforcement Learning-Based Rate Adaptation (RLRA) [20], for dynamic control over streaming operations are discussed & evaluated under different scenarios. These models are further extended via the work in [21,22,23,24,25], which propose use of Shift-Tile-Tracking (STC), LSTM based streaming, scalable-high-efficiency-video-coding (SHVC) with device-to-device communications, Sliding-Window Forward Error Correction (SW FEC), and context-aware streaming, which enables real-time processing for different video types. Extended models that use Proactive Caching [26], and Video streaming based on super resolution [27] are also discussed, and are highly useful for a wide variety of real-time use cases.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Existing Streaming Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop a better QoE and better performance, recent studies have explored the advantages of the machine and DL architectures in AFEC for real-time video transmission in multi-path environments. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [11] has recently attracted many researchers to embed these networks with AFECs. Despite implementing Deep Learning (DL) methods that improve performance, video streaming applications in multi-homed clients continue to suffer from packet losses, distortion, low PDR, and latency [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%