2010
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures

Abstract: The R code of the proposed method is available at http://aspendb.uga.edu/downloads for academic use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
156
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypo/hypermethylated regions covered by at least 10 reads with percentage methylation difference larger than 25% were identified using q-value , 0.01. Fisher's exact test was used to calculate P values, and P values were adjusted to q-values using the SLIM method (Wang et al, 2011). The location and function of genes in the soybean genome version Wm82.a2.v1 were downloaded from Phytozome (Goodstein et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypo/hypermethylated regions covered by at least 10 reads with percentage methylation difference larger than 25% were identified using q-value , 0.01. Fisher's exact test was used to calculate P values, and P values were adjusted to q-values using the SLIM method (Wang et al, 2011). The location and function of genes in the soybean genome version Wm82.a2.v1 were downloaded from Phytozome (Goodstein et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each CpG, the proportions of methylated reads in the two photoperiods were compared using the Fisher's exact test, and the P-values were corrected to genomic-wide false discovery rate (FDR)-based Q-values by using the SLIM method (Wang et al 2011). The methylated sites were mapped to genes using custom Perl scripts.…”
Section: Wwwgenomeorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward and reverse strand CpG site coverage essentially represent the same CpG sites; we have combined forward and reverse coverage by setting the DESTRAND = True parameter in methylKit package (default = False). Differentially methylated CpG sites were identified using methylKit algorithm [59] that used logistic regression to calculate p-values, adjusted the p-values for multiple hypothesis testing and generated q values using SLIM approach [60]. The criteria used for identification of differentially methylated CpG sites was q-value of < 0.01 and a percent methylation difference ≥ 25% for each individual CpG site.…”
Section: Analysis Of Differential Dna Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%