Slim cigarette smoking prevalence among Canadian youth smokers: Implications for federal standardized packaging legislation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Tobacco companies market to females and young people through slim cigarette design features and packaging. This study assessed the prevalence and perceptions of slim cigarette smoking in grades 9-12 student smokers across Canada using multiple data sources. (2015) were used. The prevalence and perceptions of slim cigarette smoking among current smokers were compared by sex and grade. METHODS:RESULTS: In all surveys, the rate of slim cigarette use was higher among females than males; however, this difference was not statistically significant. In the two most recent surveys, grades 9-10 students had a significantly higher prevalence of use compared with grades 11-12 students. The majority of students (59.8% of females and 53.3% of males) responded, "I don't know" to the survey item seeking to determine perceptions of harm of slim cigarettes compared with regular cigarettes.CONCLUSION: Slim cigarette use among Canadian grades 9-12 students represents a small but growing problem. Youths' uncertainty around the harms associated with slim cigarette use and the effect of slim cigarette packaging and design on harm perceptions indicate the need for product design regulations and further education in Canada.KEY WORDS: Adolescent; smoking; product packaging La traduction du résumé se trouve à la fin de l'article.

Smokers’ support for the ban on sale of slim cigarettes in six European countries: findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys

“…All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS-callable SUDAAN (Version 11.0.3) to account for the complex sampling design and cross-sectional sampling weights. In addition to standard sociodemographic measures, covariates for regression models were selected because they were used in the construction of sampling weights 13 , 16 or because they were used in previous empirical research on slim cigarettes 18 , 19 or perceptions of the harmfulness of different tobacco products 20 . “Harm of own cigarette brand vs other brands” was included as a covariate in the model examining support for a slim ban because respondents were not directly asked whether they smoked a slim brand.…”

Slim cigarette smoking in Urban China: Who are the early adopters and why?

“…Earlier studies have found that the introduction and promotion of slim cigarettes in several English-speaking countries were associated with the increase of women there smoking [7][8][9][10][11]. More recent studies, including surveys, focus groups, and analysis of industry strategies, have found that the interest in slim cigarettes is not limited to English-speaking countries [8,[12][13][14][15][16]. For example, 2017 sales data showed substantial market shares of slim cigarettes in Russia (15.1%), Latvia (21.2%), Poland (27.9%), Belarus (30.5%), and South Korea (36.6%) [17].…”