2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46439-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slim-Trees: High Performance Metric Trees Minimizing Overlap between Nodes

Abstract: We describe the use of meeting metadata, acquired using a computerized meeting organization and note-taking system, to improve automatic transcription of meetings. By applying a two-step language model adaptation process based on notes and agenda items, we were able to reduce perplexity by 9% and word error rate by 4% relative on a set of ten meetings recorded in-house. This approach can be used to leverage other types of metadata.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
75

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
107
0
75
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical analysis of these structures can be quite difficult, so experimental validation becomes essential. There are some theoretically defined measures such as the fat and bloat factors and prunability of Traina Jr. et al [36,37], but even such properties are generally established empirically for a given structure. 48 Moret [38] gives some reasons why asymptotic analysis alone may not be enough for algorithm studies in general (the worst-case behavior may be restricted to a very small subset of instances and thus not be at all characteristic of instances encountered in practice, and even in the absence of these problems, deriving tight asymptotic bounds may be very difficult).…”
Section: Methods Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The theoretical analysis of these structures can be quite difficult, so experimental validation becomes essential. There are some theoretically defined measures such as the fat and bloat factors and prunability of Traina Jr. et al [36,37], but even such properties are generally established empirically for a given structure. 48 Moret [38] gives some reasons why asymptotic analysis alone may not be enough for algorithm studies in general (the worst-case behavior may be restricted to a very small subset of instances and thus not be at all characteristic of instances encountered in practice, and even in the absence of these problems, deriving tight asymptotic bounds may be very difficult).…”
Section: Methods Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12(a)). 36 This space bisection is used by the GH-tree, and the multiway equivalent is used by the structure called the Geometric Near-neighbor Access Tree, or simply GNAT (see Fig. 12(b)).…”
Section: Metric Planes and Dirichlet Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 In an image database, a specific index tree is built for each type of feature vector and each comparative method. This mechanism allows Q2 A NEW FAMILY OF DISTANCE FUNCTIONS FOR PERCEPTUAL SIMILARITY for the effective retrieval of information from image databases, following user-defined parameters.…”
Section: Background On Distance Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indexes based on clustering are better suited for high-dimensional metric spaces or larger query radii, that is, the cases where the problem is more difficult [2]. Some clustering-based indexes are the Voronoi tree [3], the GNAT [4], the M-tree [5], the Slim-tree [6], and the SAT [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%