2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slime coatings in froth flotation: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
53
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a hydrophobic clay mineral that can be easily entrained into froth layers, thus lowering the concentrate grade [13,14]. Moreover, clinochlore could attach on cassiterite surfaces as "slime coating", which has detrimental effect on the recovery of cassiterite in direct flotation even with an efficient collector [11,15,16]. Therefore, the separation of clinochlore from cassiterite is difficult to achieve in direct flotation due to the hydrophobic property of clinochlore surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a hydrophobic clay mineral that can be easily entrained into froth layers, thus lowering the concentrate grade [13,14]. Moreover, clinochlore could attach on cassiterite surfaces as "slime coating", which has detrimental effect on the recovery of cassiterite in direct flotation even with an efficient collector [11,15,16]. Therefore, the separation of clinochlore from cassiterite is difficult to achieve in direct flotation due to the hydrophobic property of clinochlore surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With pH 10, the highest recovery was obtained. The metal recovery of tailings was not very high; the possible reason could be that the mechanical entrainment, which leads to transport of gangue material with mineral particles increases with increase in percentage of fine particles [62]. It is more likely to operate on fine particles, which are prone to be carried over in liquid due to relatively low mass (refer to Figure 6 for entrainment explanation).…”
Section: Flotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it can be deduced that the slight decrease of pyrite recovery was caused by the adsorption of aluminum hydroxyl onto pyrite surfaces, which decreased the hydrophobicity of pyrite [25,26]. In contrast, the flotation recovery of pyrite was rather low, with a value of about 14% in the presence of serpentine at pH 9, which shows that fine serpentine had an adverse influence on pyrite flotation due to the serpentine slime coatings [13]. Interestingly, the flotation recovery of pyrite was significantly improved with the addition of KAl(SO 4 ) 2 ·12H 2 O, and a maximum increasement Figure 4 shows the flotation recovery of pyrite under different conditions as a function of the pulp pH.…”
Section: Flotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practice, the results are not so satisfactory due to the high dosage and the lack of selectivity of the dispersant. In addition, physical methods such as ultrasonic treatment and high-intensity conditioning have been usually employed to remove the slime coatings from valuable mineral surfaces [11][12][13]. However, it appears that ultrasonic treatment and high-intensity conditioning are not efficiently economical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%