1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1973.tb00937.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slime Production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: Chemical properties and compositions of slimes produced by two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains of different colonial types were investigated. The main component of the slime from strain IFO 3445 was found to be DNA, contaminated with small amounts of protein. On the other hand, the slime from a mucoid‐type strain No. 24 was an alginate‐like substance consisting of mannuronic and glucuronic acids, and contained traces of protein and nucleic acid. Slimes from twenty clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were investi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of DNA in the EPS and its responsibility for the stickiness of the by then so called “slime” or “mats” was discovered as early as in 1955 for some halophilic bacteria (Smithies and Gibbons 1955 ) and several years later with a focus on human pathogens for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Murakawa 1973 ). Beginning in 1996, exDNA was increasingly noted in the EPS matrix of activated sludge and in pure cultures of Pseudomonas putida (reviewed by Flemming and Wingender 2010 ).…”
Section: Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of DNA in the EPS and its responsibility for the stickiness of the by then so called “slime” or “mats” was discovered as early as in 1955 for some halophilic bacteria (Smithies and Gibbons 1955 ) and several years later with a focus on human pathogens for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Murakawa 1973 ). Beginning in 1996, exDNA was increasingly noted in the EPS matrix of activated sludge and in pure cultures of Pseudomonas putida (reviewed by Flemming and Wingender 2010 ).…”
Section: Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eDNA has been recognized as a potential constituent of the in vivo biofilm matrix since at least the 1970s, when analysis of the “slime” produced by several clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa revealed the presence of DNA ( Murakawa, 1973 ). For many years, eDNA in biofilms was thought to be mostly a byproduct of lysed cells with unclear functional significance ( Sutherland, 2001 ).…”
Section: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Affecting Tissue-associated ...mentioning
confidence: 99%