2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-016-0389-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip deficit in central Nepal: omen for a repeat of the 1344 AD earthquake?

Abstract: In 1255, 1344, and 1408 AD, then again in 1833, 1934, and 2015, large earthquakes, devastated Kathmandu. The 1255 and 1934 surface ruptures have been identified east of the city, along comparable segments of the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT). Whether the other two pairs of events were similar is unclear. Taking into account charcoal's age inheritance, we revisit the timing of terrace offsets at key sites to compare them with the seismic record since 1200 AD. The location, extent, and moment of the 1833 and 2015 ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bilham 1999;Ambraseys and Douglas 2004;Martin and Szeliga 2010;Szeliga et al 2010). A growing number of completed and ongoing palaeoseismic studies in the Nepal Himalayas (Lavé et al 2005;Mugnier et al 2005;Sapkota et al 2013;Bollinger et al 2014;Murphy et al 2014;Karakaş et al 2015;Bollinger et al 2016;Hossler et al 2016) have contributed further to our knowledge of pre-instrumental earthquakes in the region, although the catalogue clearly remains far from complete. It is clear that Himalayan earthquakes pose a significant hazard to not only Nepal and the Kathmandu valley specifically, but also the densely populated and rapidly urbanizing Gangetic Basin (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bilham 1999;Ambraseys and Douglas 2004;Martin and Szeliga 2010;Szeliga et al 2010). A growing number of completed and ongoing palaeoseismic studies in the Nepal Himalayas (Lavé et al 2005;Mugnier et al 2005;Sapkota et al 2013;Bollinger et al 2014;Murphy et al 2014;Karakaş et al 2015;Bollinger et al 2016;Hossler et al 2016) have contributed further to our knowledge of pre-instrumental earthquakes in the region, although the catalogue clearly remains far from complete. It is clear that Himalayan earthquakes pose a significant hazard to not only Nepal and the Kathmandu valley specifically, but also the densely populated and rapidly urbanizing Gangetic Basin (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gorkha earthquake is no exception in terms of enormous losses in environmental impacts, casualties and infrastructures. Details on geology and seismo-tectonics of Nepal Himalaya can be found in several literatures by Upreti and Le Fort (1999), Sakai (2001), Pandey et al (1999), Dhital (2014), Hossler et al (2016); Bollinger et al (2016), Wesnousky et al (2017) and others.…”
Section: Geology and Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface rupture of 1255 AD earthquake reported from the Sir trenches in Central Nepal (Sapkota et al 2013) has been extended up to far east to Harmutty in the eastern part India (Mishra et al 2016) or at least to Hokse in eastern Nepal by Bollinger et al (2016). The 1255 AD is assigned to be a giant earthquake rupturing ~800 km of the Himalayan arc (Mishra et al 2016).…”
Section: Historical Earthquakes and Rupturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades, several paleo-seismological investigation has been carried out along the active HFT which has provided significant data to understand the occurrence of large magnitude earthquakes in the Himalayan region (Wesnousky et al 1999;Malik and Nakata 2003;Lavé et al 2005;Malik et al 2008Malik et al , 2010aMalik et al , b, 2015Malik et al , 2016Kumar and Mahajan 2001;Kumar et al 2006Kumar et al , 2010Kumahara and Jayangondaperumal 2013;Sapkota et al 2013;Yule et al 2006;Bollinger et al 2014Bollinger et al , 2016Jayangondaperumal et al 2016;Mishra et al 2016). However, there exist constraints in terms of their period of occurrence and in determining the extent of surface rupture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%