2018
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2863360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip Sensing for Intelligent, Improved Grasping and Retraction in Robot-Assisted Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] did not indicate that this would negatively impact the slip sensor's performance. Finally, we wished to compare the new data with our previous ex vivo results [7] to determine whether the device under in vivo conditions has comparable sensitivity. With these considerations in mind, we tested mesentery, artery, fat, and bowel.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[7] did not indicate that this would negatively impact the slip sensor's performance. Finally, we wished to compare the new data with our previous ex vivo results [7] to determine whether the device under in vivo conditions has comparable sensitivity. With these considerations in mind, we tested mesentery, artery, fat, and bowel.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 Device Characterization 3.1 Purpose and Methods. This characterization study sought to validate the tissue slip sensor [7] on living, perfused porcine tissues. We anticipated that the convective effects of blood flow (either in highly perfused tissue like mesentery or in a blood vessel with strong flow) may affect the performance of the device.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations