2007
DOI: 10.1075/ml.2.3.03kui
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slipping on superlemmas

Abstract: Only relatively recently have theories of speech production concerned themselves with the part idioms and other multi-word lexical items (MLIs) play in the processes of speech production. Two theories of speech production which attempt to account for the accessing of idioms in speech production are those of Cutting and Bock (1997) and superlemma theory (Sprenger, 2003; Sprenger, Levelt, & Kempen, 2006). Much of the data supporting theories of speech production comes either from time course experiments or f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These errors were distortions of formulaic expressions ( If I can’t say anything pleasant, just keep quiet; likely morphed from, “If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all”; and Put down my mind to it, from, “Put my mind to it”). These errors from the speakers with AD differ from speech error blends on formulas reported for healthy adults (e.g., “ Talks to my heart strings ,” Kuiper, Van Egmond, Kempen & Sprenger, 2007, p. 337) and have not been reported before. Healthy control participants in this study did not have any instances of formulaic expression error blends or formula distortion errors.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…These errors were distortions of formulaic expressions ( If I can’t say anything pleasant, just keep quiet; likely morphed from, “If you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all”; and Put down my mind to it, from, “Put my mind to it”). These errors from the speakers with AD differ from speech error blends on formulas reported for healthy adults (e.g., “ Talks to my heart strings ,” Kuiper, Van Egmond, Kempen & Sprenger, 2007, p. 337) and have not been reported before. Healthy control participants in this study did not have any instances of formulaic expression error blends or formula distortion errors.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…It is possible, though, to assume separate whole-word lemmas similar to “ superlemmas ” in idiom processing that are activated by the simultaneous activation of several constituents at the lexical level (e.g., Sprenger et al, 2006; Kuiper et al, 2007; Smolka et al, 2007a; Rabanus et al, 2008). Irrespective of how the specific meaning is activated following lexical access, our findings indicate that the complex verb is lexically accessed and processed via its stem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more recent hybrid model suggests that formulaic expressions have at least two kinds (or "levels") of representationsone in holistic profile and another in compositional form (Sprenger et al, 2006). All of these perspectives agree that formulaic expressions differ in key characteristics from newly created grammatical expressions (Erman & Warren, 2000;Lounsbury, 1963;Wray, 2002) and that one of these characteristics is a Gestalt or holistic profile of the expression, or unitary representation in memory (Biber, 2009;Bolinger, 1976Bolinger, , 1977Kuiper, 2009;Kuiper, Van Egmond, Kempen, & Sprenger, 2007;Rammell et al, 2014). The evidence reviewed above suggests that brain damage affects these two modes of language differently.…”
Section: A Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%