2014
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0845-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slope shape effect on runoff and soil erosion under natural rainfall conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Torri and Poesen [50] found that the soil surface slope has a positive effect on splash detachment. The results of studies conducted by Fu et al [30], Moreno de las Heras et al [34], andŞensoy and Kara [35] also indicate that the amounts of runoff and soil loss increased with increasing trail gradient. Numerous studies have indicated that the degree of soil erosion is related to rainfall intensity and trail gradient [31,32].…”
Section: Sediment Yieldmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Torri and Poesen [50] found that the soil surface slope has a positive effect on splash detachment. The results of studies conducted by Fu et al [30], Moreno de las Heras et al [34], andŞensoy and Kara [35] also indicate that the amounts of runoff and soil loss increased with increasing trail gradient. Numerous studies have indicated that the degree of soil erosion is related to rainfall intensity and trail gradient [31,32].…”
Section: Sediment Yieldmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Trail gradient is a main factor that has a significant effect on soil particle detachment and transport, as well as runoff erodibility [28][29][30][31][32]. Several studies have focused on the effect of trail gradient, length, and shape on runoff generation and soil loss [32][33][34][35].Şensoy and Kara [35] found that runoff and soil loss were greater in uniform plots (ground without slope failure) than in concave and convex plots on a 30% trail gradient. The variability between uniform and concave gradients may explain the differences in the energy of runoff available for erosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be due to the indirect influence of topographic attributes on vegetation status, as concave slopes, located towards the depression parts of the study area [31], are most likely assumed to be cooler in summer as compared to flat land; hence, the crops could senescence late and could remain vital for a longer time. In addition, this could also be due to the fact that drainage patterns vary with slope shape, bearing implications on soil moisture conditions of a landscape, in such a way that concave slopes produce less runoff compared with flat and convex slopes [64,65]. In the study area the different slope shapes also have a complex interaction with prevailing soil types, due to erosion and deposition processes [55].…”
Section: Influence Of Topographic Features On C Ndvimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonnett (1990) observed the redistribution of 137 Cs and 134 Cs by erosive processes over an area of a drainage basin. Slope gradient, length, and shape also affect runoff generation and soil erosion (Şensoy and Kara 2014). As the soil profiles in this study were collected from slopes at randomly selected locations (Table 2), it is not possible to directly correlate the 137 Cs activity concentration with slopes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%