Slot-Scan Digital Radiography of the Lower Extremities: a Comparison to Computed Radiography with Respect to Image Quality and Radiation Dose

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the slot-scan digital radiography (SSDR) of the lower extremity region and the computed radiography (CR) method with respect to the image quality and radiation exposure.Materials and MethodsWe enrolled 54 patients who underwent both the SSDR and CR of the lower extremities. The study evaluated and statistically compared the image quality of four features (outer cortex, inner cortex, trabeculae and intermuscular fat) at six different levels (pelvis, hip, femur, knee, tibia and ankle) between each method. The image quality was evaluated using a visibility scale, and the entrance skin dose was measured using a dosimeter at three different levels of a phantom (hip, knee, and ankle).ResultsThe mean image visibility scale values for the SSDR method were significantly higher than for the CR method. The entrance skin dose for the SSDR method was 278 µGy at each level, compared to the entrance skin doses of the CR method, which were 3,410 µGy for the hip, 1,152 µGy for the knee, and 580 µGy for the ankle.ConclusionBoth the image quality and patient entrance skin dose data suggest that the SSDR method is superior to the CR method for the lower extremity musculoskeletal examination.

Talbot-Lau x-ray phase-contrast setup for fast scanning of large samples

“… 54 and Kwang et al . 55 who state doses of 687 μGy for an adult patient and 278 μGy for slot-scanning radiography, respectively.…”

Lower Limb Alignment in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Deficient versus –Intact Knees

“…The health hazard caused by the ionising radiation was minimal. 9 This study was approved by the cluster clinical research ethical committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.…”

Abdominal Digital Radiography with a Novel Post-Processing Technique: Phantom and Patient Studies

“…Precht et al ( 6 ) used multi-frequency processing, which decomposes the image into a series of sub-frequency images and then to fuse these into one single image with optimized contrast, achieved optimal image quality at a dose reduction of 61%. In addition, with new detector designs, other studies shown improved, or maintained image quality with average dose reduction of 30% ( 7 8 ).…”