1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(84)84187-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow inactivation of a tetrodotoxin-sensitive current in canine cardiac Purkinje fibers

Abstract: We used the two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique and tetrodotoxin (TTX) to investigate the possible occurrence of slow inactivation of sodium channels in canine cardiac Purkinje fibers under physiologic conditions. The increase in net outward current during prolonged (5-20 s) step depolarizations (range -70 to +5 mV) following the application of TTX is time dependent, being maximal immediately following depolarization, and declining thereafter towards a steady value. To eliminate the possibility that thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ranolazine and lidocaine both interact with Na ϩ channels at the same site on domain IV S6 (Fredj et al, 2006) and preferentially block the late Na current (Wasserstrom and Salata, 1988;An et al, 1996;Dumaine and Kirsch, 1998;Antzelevitch et al, 2004b). Because late I Na plays a prominent role in determining APD (Gintant et al, 1984;Carmeliet, 1987;Kiyosue and Arita, 1989;Maltsev et al, 1998;Sakmann et al, 2000) and a facilitating role in EAD formation, particularly under conditions in which I Kr and I Ks are reduced (Clancy and Rudy, 1999;Antzelevitch, 2000;Song et al, 2004;Fedida et al, 2006;Orth et al, 2006), it is reasonable to attribute the antiTdP effect of ranolazine to its late I Na blockade. By this hypothesis, blocking late I Na with ranolazine and lidocaine offsets the prolongation of ventricular repolarization by the I Kr blocker clofilium and thereby inhibits clofilium-induced TdP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ranolazine and lidocaine both interact with Na ϩ channels at the same site on domain IV S6 (Fredj et al, 2006) and preferentially block the late Na current (Wasserstrom and Salata, 1988;An et al, 1996;Dumaine and Kirsch, 1998;Antzelevitch et al, 2004b). Because late I Na plays a prominent role in determining APD (Gintant et al, 1984;Carmeliet, 1987;Kiyosue and Arita, 1989;Maltsev et al, 1998;Sakmann et al, 2000) and a facilitating role in EAD formation, particularly under conditions in which I Kr and I Ks are reduced (Clancy and Rudy, 1999;Antzelevitch, 2000;Song et al, 2004;Fedida et al, 2006;Orth et al, 2006), it is reasonable to attribute the antiTdP effect of ranolazine to its late I Na blockade. By this hypothesis, blocking late I Na with ranolazine and lidocaine offsets the prolongation of ventricular repolarization by the I Kr blocker clofilium and thereby inhibits clofilium-induced TdP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They could inactivate with time constants of several hundred msec and be particularly sensitive to TTX. This suggestion is supported by demonstration of a small, slowly inactivating component of Na + current in rabbit Purkinje strands (Gintant et al, 1984;Carmeliet, 1984). Second, there might be voltagedependent, time-independent Na + channels that provide inward current at plateau voltages (Attwell et al, 1979).…”
Section: Late Na + Currentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A component of slowly inactivating Na+ current (Gintant et al 1984;Carmeliet, 1985) will, however, remain M. R. BO YETT, G. HART AND A. J. LEVI at 0 mV since the peak amplitude of this current lies at around -10 mV (Carmeliet, 1985).…”
Section: The Na+ Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%