2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow infusion of calcium channel blockers compared with intravenous adenosine in the emergency treatment of supraventricular tachycardia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
41
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Caffeine can also induce PSVT [669]. Slow infusion of calcium channel blockers are claimed to be a safe alternative to adenosine for the emergency treatment of PSVT [671]. The relative efficacy of adenosine and verapamil for the treatment of PSVT were found to be similar; adenosine had a higher rate of minor adverse effects, while verapamil had a higher rate of causing hypotension [672].…”
Section: Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caffeine can also induce PSVT [669]. Slow infusion of calcium channel blockers are claimed to be a safe alternative to adenosine for the emergency treatment of PSVT [671]. The relative efficacy of adenosine and verapamil for the treatment of PSVT were found to be similar; adenosine had a higher rate of minor adverse effects, while verapamil had a higher rate of causing hypotension [672].…”
Section: Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Administering a calcium-channel blocker intravenously over 20 minutes has been shown to reduce the rate of hypotension. 23 There are fewer data supporting the use of β-blockers in the acute treatment of SVT; however, they are considered reasonable choices because of their safety profile. 5,23 If all aforementioned pharmacologic therapies fail, synchronized cardioversion is recommended, even in hemodynamically stable patients.…”
Section: Pharmacologic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 There are fewer data supporting the use of β-blockers in the acute treatment of SVT; however, they are considered reasonable choices because of their safety profile. 5,23 If all aforementioned pharmacologic therapies fail, synchronized cardioversion is recommended, even in hemodynamically stable patients. 5 In patients presenting in atrial fibrillation who have known Wolff-Parkinson-White or new pre-excitation pattern on ECG, the use of potent AV-nodal blockers (i.e., β-blockers, diltiazem, verapamil and digoxin) should be avoided because these medications may potentiate conduction over the accessory pathway and lead to potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.…”
Section: Pharmacologic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kalsiyum kanal blokörlerinin yavaş infüz-yon şeklinde uygulanmasıyla görülen hipotansiyon oranının azaltılabildiği de ispatlanmıştır. [17] Etkinlikleri denk olarak ispatlanmış bu iki ajan arasında tercih yaparken her hastanın durumunu ayrı ayrı göz önüne alarak o hasta için en uygun ajan tercih edilmelidir. [16] Flurbiprofen %0.25 oral sprey (Majezik sprey®)…”
Section: Adenozinunclassified