2007
DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.2.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow Moving Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
160
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
16
160
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if the mispricing deepens, they will be inclined to withdraw money or liquidate collateral, forcing the fund to liquidate its position ahead of time. Recently, Mitchell, Pedersen and Pulvino (2007) empirically document such effects for the convertible bond market and merger arbitrage during the 1987 market crash.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the mispricing deepens, they will be inclined to withdraw money or liquidate collateral, forcing the fund to liquidate its position ahead of time. Recently, Mitchell, Pedersen and Pulvino (2007) empirically document such effects for the convertible bond market and merger arbitrage during the 1987 market crash.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most proxies exhibit substantial autocorrelation (see figure 1) so that at least slow moving capital effects (e.g. Mitchell et al (2007)) should partly be 5 More precisely, the Vix and the illiquidity measure tend to become more significant if we use their raw level in the previous month. They remain insignificant if we rely on the dummy approach distinguishing between high and low periods of limits to arbitrage.…”
Section: Non-linearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unrealistic. There is a significant literature on 'fire sales' and their general effect on liquidity; that is, their tendency to depress the value of other institutions' external assets (Pulvino 1998;Cifuentes et al 2005;Kaufman 2005;Coval & Stafford 2007;Mitchell et al 2007). As a first step, it is useful to consider such effects on the disposal of assets of a failed bank, ignoring for the moment the indirect effects elsewhere in the system.…”
Section: Liquidity Risk: Zero Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%