2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-448196/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow slip events are regular earthquakes

Abstract: Slow slip events usually occur downdip of seismogenic zones in subduction megathrusts and crustal faults, with rupture speeds much slower than earthquakes. The empirical moment-duration scaling relation can help constrain the physical mechanism of slow slip events, yet it is still debated whether this scaling is linear or cubic and a fundamental model unifying slow slip events and earthquakes is still lacking. Here I present numerical simulations that show that slow slip events are regular earthquakes with neg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a shear modulus of μ = 30 GPa, we arrive at Knormalcdrained ranging from 0.1 to 1.7 MPa m 1/2 , which overlaps with the K estimate only when very low stress drops are considered in conjunction with large slip weakening distances and effective stress. In addition, rupture events are not expected to be stable if we consider only a balance between K and Knormalcdrained, since any increase in K would lead to dynamic acceleration of the rupture tip (Weng, 2021). When dilatancy is accounted for, ruptures are stabilized since any increase in K and rupture speed can be matched by a corresponding increase in K c (Figure 4; see below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a shear modulus of μ = 30 GPa, we arrive at Knormalcdrained ranging from 0.1 to 1.7 MPa m 1/2 , which overlaps with the K estimate only when very low stress drops are considered in conjunction with large slip weakening distances and effective stress. In addition, rupture events are not expected to be stable if we consider only a balance between K and Knormalcdrained, since any increase in K would lead to dynamic acceleration of the rupture tip (Weng, 2021). When dilatancy is accounted for, ruptures are stabilized since any increase in K and rupture speed can be matched by a corresponding increase in K c (Figure 4; see below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a shear modulus of μ = 30 GPa, we arrive at 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 drained c ranging from 0.1 to 1.7 MPa m 1/2 , which overlaps with the K estimate only when very low stress drops are considered in conjunction with large slip weakening distances and effective stress. In addition, rupture events are not expected to be stable if we consider only a balance between K and 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 drained c , since any increase in K would lead to dynamic acceleration of the rupture tip (Weng, 2021). When dilatancy is accounted for, ruptures are stabilized since any increase in K and rupture speed can be matched by a corresponding increase in K c (Figure 4; see below).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%