2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014gl059581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slowdown of Circumpolar Deepwater flow during the Late Neogene: Evidence from a mudwave field at the Argentine continental slope

Abstract: Geochemical evidence from boreholes suggests enhanced transport of Northern Component Water (NCW) to southern latitudes from about 6 Ma onward. However, information on how this change in transport influenced the intensity and position of current systems is sparse. Here we use seismic reflection profiles interpreted together with bathymetric data to investigate current derived deposits at the central Argentine Margin. Upslope migrating mudwaves overlying a late Miocene erosional unconformity provide evidence th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the upslope wave migration at the Argentine slope (Figure ) is in agreement with a north setting bottom current flow during the Plio‐Pleistocene since modeling studies [ Blumsack and Weatherly , ] as well as empirical investigations [ Flood et al ., ; Gruetzner et al ., ] suggest that in the Southern Hemisphere, sediment wave migration is commonly to the left of the flow direction. The observed sediment wavefield (40°S–41°S) located north of the mounded sediment drift (41°S–42°S, Figure d) occurs at the same depth level (4000–5000 m) as another wavefield and another mounded drift mapped at 42.5°S–44°S and 44°S–45°S, respectively [ Gruetzner et al ., ]. Figure shows that the waves formed directly above the erosional unconformity AR7 which indicates that deep current velocities at ∼6 Ma slowed down into a range where wave (and drift) growth was possible at the rise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also the upslope wave migration at the Argentine slope (Figure ) is in agreement with a north setting bottom current flow during the Plio‐Pleistocene since modeling studies [ Blumsack and Weatherly , ] as well as empirical investigations [ Flood et al ., ; Gruetzner et al ., ] suggest that in the Southern Hemisphere, sediment wave migration is commonly to the left of the flow direction. The observed sediment wavefield (40°S–41°S) located north of the mounded sediment drift (41°S–42°S, Figure d) occurs at the same depth level (4000–5000 m) as another wavefield and another mounded drift mapped at 42.5°S–44°S and 44°S–45°S, respectively [ Gruetzner et al ., ]. Figure shows that the waves formed directly above the erosional unconformity AR7 which indicates that deep current velocities at ∼6 Ma slowed down into a range where wave (and drift) growth was possible at the rise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wavy appearance of the internal reflections of this unit indicates bottom flow over long periods of time that could have been caused either by contour currents or by turbidity flow. Although other buried sediment wavefields at the central margin have been attributed to a contouritic origin [Gruetzner et al, 2014], we argue that the wavy structures at the lower slope may predominantly reflect downslope transport processes for the following reasons: (1) indications for currentinduced features of this age interval in other margin segments are very sparse [Gruetzner et al, 2012]. (2) The wavy structures often have an irregular shape, show no clear migration direction or even migrate downslope ( Figure 6, SP 2800-3000).…”
Section: Gravitational Sediment Deposition and Andean Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Downslope sediment flows and river‐fed turbidite systems have been described for the eastern margin of southern Africa (Castelino et al, ; Wiles et al, ) but the Site U1475 sediment cores from the elevated top of the AP do not show any turbiditic sedimentary structures (Hall et al, ). Thus, we interpret the sediment waves on the AP, which developed contemporaneously to a wavefield at the same latitude in the western Atlantic (Gruetzner et al, ), to be shaped by contouritic bottom currents. A model of sediment wave formation (Flood, ) predicts that the observed wave dimensions at the AP can form under geostrophic flow velocities that range from ~8 to 17 cm/s and the observation that the wave crests do not exhibit a significant up‐current migration would point toward flow velocities at the lower end of this range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%