2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2003.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slowing deforestation pace through subsidies: a differential game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of papers in the dynamic game literature (e.g. van Soest and Lensink (2000), Fredj et al (2004Fredj et al ( , 2006, Martín-Herrán and Tidball (2005) and Martín-Herrán et al (2006)) have looked at the conditions necessary to build environmental agreements that are both credible and sustainable when it comes to stopping deforestation. In these papers the environmentally aware players (non-forest-owners) are willing to compensate forest owners in order to have deforestation reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of papers in the dynamic game literature (e.g. van Soest and Lensink (2000), Fredj et al (2004Fredj et al ( , 2006, Martín-Herrán and Tidball (2005) and Martín-Herrán et al (2006)) have looked at the conditions necessary to build environmental agreements that are both credible and sustainable when it comes to stopping deforestation. In these papers the environmentally aware players (non-forest-owners) are willing to compensate forest owners in order to have deforestation reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a literature that deals with forest depletion using a dynamic-game approach (e.g., van Soest and Lensink (2000), Fredj et al (2004Fredj et al ( , 2006, Martín-Herrán and Tidball (2005) and Martín-Herrán et al (2006)). In these articles the players are forest owners, who exploit their asset to obtain economic revenues; and a donor community, or an environmentally aware player, who is willing to compensate forest owners who engage in preservation efforts of the resource.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be, in fact, an act of land speculation based on either high tolerance shown by the political system or insufficient administrative and environmental monitoring mechanisms. Yet, in the context of game theory it is proposed that it is possible to arrive to sufficient and sustainable solutions to the issue of deforestation through cooperation and coordination of the involved parties and individuals (Fredj, Martνn-Herrαn et al 2004;Stern 2006). On the other hand, there is a quite different view concerning the current social behaviour and state intervention towards forest resources.…”
Section: Review Of Theoretical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar body of approaches attempts to apply concepts from "game theory" in order to capture agents' behaviour in forest land use change process. (Fredj, Martνn-Herrαn et al 2004). According to some of these perspectives, the major decisive force of the way forest resources are utilized is state policies.…”
Section: Review Of Theoretical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al (2006),Luckraz (2006),Engwerda et al (2002),Kemp et al (2001) Environmental economicsBreton et al (2006b),,,Cabo et al (forthcoming),Fredj et al (2004Fredj et al ( , 2006,Fernández (2002),Rubio and Casino (2002), List and Mason (2001) Industrial organization Jun and Vives (2004), Laussel et al (2004), Cellini and Lambertini (2005a), Rubio (2006), Benchekroun (2003), Miravete (2003), Thepot (2002) Capital accumulation Calzolari and Lambertini (2006), Cellini and Lambertini (2006), Figuieres (2002) Advertising Bass et al (2005a,b), Prasad and Sethi (2004), Fruchter (2001) Shelf-space allocation Martín-Herrán and Taboubi (2005a,b), Martín-Herrán et al (2005) Marketing channelsJørgensen et al ( , 2001a,Rubel and Zaccour (2006), Resource economicsLong and Sorger (2006), Sorger(2005), Martín-Herrán and Rincón-Zapatero (2005), Rubio and Casino (2003, 2001), Rubio and Escriche (2001) Pricing Cellini and Lambertini (2006), Fruchter and Tapiero (2005), Haruvy et al (2005), Dockner and Fruchter (2004) R&D…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%