2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slurry erosion behaviour of thermomechanically treated 16Cr5Ni stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As received 16Cr-5Ni steel was found better in context to resistance to SE while compared to all TMP samples. 111 TMP with 950 °C and 0.001 s −1 showed the least erosive wear among all TMP parametric combinations. 106,111 Baghel et al 113 studied the effect of hot forging at three different temperatures and constant strain rate on SE wear behavior of SS410 (martensite) as well as SS316 (austenite) on their wear performance.…”
Section: Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As received 16Cr-5Ni steel was found better in context to resistance to SE while compared to all TMP samples. 111 TMP with 950 °C and 0.001 s −1 showed the least erosive wear among all TMP parametric combinations. 106,111 Baghel et al 113 studied the effect of hot forging at three different temperatures and constant strain rate on SE wear behavior of SS410 (martensite) as well as SS316 (austenite) on their wear performance.…”
Section: Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…111 TMP with 950 °C and 0.001 s −1 showed the least erosive wear among all TMP parametric combinations. 106,111 Baghel et al 113 studied the effect of hot forging at three different temperatures and constant strain rate on SE wear behavior of SS410 (martensite) as well as SS316 (austenite) on their wear performance. SS410 exhibited the best erosion resistance compared to SS316, for both as-received and forged.…”
Section: Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Based on the standard a-ion, Cr and Ni pattern, the Fe-Cr solid solution was deduced in the sample without nickel, but the Fe-Cr-Ni solid solution with a body-centered cubic (BCC) crystal structure could be inferred in the specimens with nickel (Prakash and Nath, 2018). Combined with the microstructures in Figure 2, it could be deduced that the BCC ferrite and body-centered tetragonal troostite presented in the specimens with nickel (Kishor et al, 2018). The reduced intensities of peaks with increasing nickel suggested a significant decrease in the volume fraction of ferrite Nath, 2020a, 2020b).…”
Section: Microscopic Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the erosion wear at an impact angle of 60°by bottom ash was found as 1.960 Â 10 À2 , 2.155 Â 10 À2 and 3.827 Â 10 À2 mm 3 , respectively, for A similar trend of erosion wear was observed for the fly ash slurry. Researchers (Gandhi et al, 1999;Kishor et al, 2018;Singh et al, 2019) investigated that the importance of impact angle in deciding the type of slurry erosion's mechanism is either ductile or brittle. In present results, the slurry erosion mechanism of Ni-20Cr coating was found to be semi-brittle, whereas it was semi-ductile for Ni-20Al and Al-20Ti.…”
Section: Effect Of Impingement Angle (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%