2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2019.2929714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SM Load Torque Observer-Based FCS-MPDSC With Single Prediction Horizon for High Dynamics of Surface-Mounted PMSM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, a three-phase PLL whose structure is shown in Figure 2 is employed to obtain the real-time voltage amplitude and frequency [32]. It can be noted that firstly, the measured phase voltages are transformed to the ones in the rotating reference frame, that is, the d, q-axis voltages V d and V q , respectively [33,34]:…”
Section: Fixed-parameter Vsg Control Incorporating F-p and Q-v Droop mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, a three-phase PLL whose structure is shown in Figure 2 is employed to obtain the real-time voltage amplitude and frequency [32]. It can be noted that firstly, the measured phase voltages are transformed to the ones in the rotating reference frame, that is, the d, q-axis voltages V d and V q , respectively [33,34]:…”
Section: Fixed-parameter Vsg Control Incorporating F-p and Q-v Droop mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between t k and t k+1 , the physical descriptions of the traditional FCS-MPCC implementation (as in Fig.1) can be explained as follows: At first, the measured and observed states at t k together with the candidate control voltages are substituted into (12) to calculate the slope (sl) of the tangent line of the current wave, namely, sl= f(t k ). Secondly, f(t k ) is treated as the slope of the following straight line:…”
Section: A Physical Explanations Of Traditional Fcs-mpcc Defects In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite control set (FCS) model predictive control (MPC), which is endowed with remarkable simplicity and strong constraint capability, has been widely used in different electric powertrains [11][12][13][14]. Without adopting any modulators for pulse width modulation (PWM) signal generation, FCS-MPC directly uses the output of the controller to determine the optimal switching state [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the merits of the optimal control mechanism, easy parameter tuning process and quick response, model predictive control (MPC) has been broadly adopted in the area of IM control [10]. MPC controllers can be used to achieve different functions, such as model Processes 2021, 9, 710 2 of 22 predictive torque control (MPTC) [11,12], model predictive speed control (MPSC) [13] and model predictive current control (MPCC) [14,15]. By considering the modulation modes of the MPC controllers, they can be further categorized into two groups, one of which requires a modulator to generate control signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the cost function directly determines the optimal switching states to be applied next. As for this method, there are only finite control voltages, so it is known as a finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) [12][13][14]16]. Comparatively speaking, the FCS-MPC strategy can reduce computational complexity significantly, benefiting from an offline lookup table.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%