2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.119187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sm3+-doped strontium barium borate phosphor for white light emission: Spectroscopic properties and Judd–Ofelt analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to Judd-Ofelt theory [88]. Similarly, only two weak emission peak of 601 and 640 nm of Sm 3+ -doped CHA could be observed, which are ascribed to the emission of 4 G5/2-6 H7/2 and 4 G5/2-6 H9/2, respectively [89]. Ho 3+ is an up-conversion emission center [27], which could not emit visible light wavelength signals under the excitation of ultraviolet excitation sources and therefore no emission peaks have been observed.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to Judd-Ofelt theory [88]. Similarly, only two weak emission peak of 601 and 640 nm of Sm 3+ -doped CHA could be observed, which are ascribed to the emission of 4 G5/2-6 H7/2 and 4 G5/2-6 H9/2, respectively [89]. Ho 3+ is an up-conversion emission center [27], which could not emit visible light wavelength signals under the excitation of ultraviolet excitation sources and therefore no emission peaks have been observed.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In our Pr 3+ doped samples, although most of the theoretical emission peaks could also be observed (Figure S22), no separated peaks could be found, which could be ascribed to the internal energy transitions resulted from of thermally induced expansion of emission cross section of Pr 3+ according to Judd-Ofelt theory [88]. Similarly, only two weak emission peak of 601 and 640 nm of Sm 3+ -doped CHA could be observed, which are ascribed to the emission of 4 G 5/2 -6 H 7/2 and 4 G 5/2 -6 H 9/2 , respectively [89]. Ho 3+ is an up-conversion emission center [27], which could not emit visible light wavelength signals under the excitation of ultraviolet excitation sources and therefore no emission peaks have been observed.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Figure 9 is the emission spectra of the samples after heat treatment at different times (12,24,36,48, and 60 h, respectively), they are all excited by near-ultraviolet light at 345 nm. There is a slight redshift of the emission peak, which is attributed to the energy transfer process caused…”
Section: Effects Of Heat Treatment On Optical Properties Of Ce-doped ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borophosphate-based glass has good optical properties, low refractive index, low dispersion, and good transparency from ultraviolet to near-infrared. [24][25][26] However, the poor thermal stability and chemical durability are the shortcomings. 27,28 Fluoride glass has ultralow melting point characteristics, but poor chemical stability, low mechanical strength, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,11,12 However, YAG:Ce 3+ phosphors generally need to be mixed with an organic resin before being glued to the chip, 13 resulting in many fatal problems such as chemical unstability, 14 low thermal conductivity, 15 and easy to age 16 caused by the organic resin. Besides, despite YAG:Ce 3+ phosphors having been widely commercialized, the lack of red emission made this type of wLEDs have a low color rendering index (CRI), [17][18][19] high correlated color temperature (CCT), 20 and easy color shift, 21 which makes a terrible user experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%