2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.24.489321
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-amplitude head oscillations result from a multimodal head stabilization reflex in hawkmoths

Abstract: In flying insects, head stabilization is an important reflex which helps to reduce motion blur during fast aerial maneuvers. This reflex is multimodal and requires the integration of visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback, each operating as a negative-feedback control loop. As in any negative-feedback system, the head stabilization system possesses inherent oscillatory dynamics that depends on the rates and latencies of the sensorimotor components constituting the reflex. Consistent with this expectation,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the recordings of head stabilization, we observed small-amplitude head oscillations (or head wobble; Chatterjee et al, 2022 ) at approximately 12 Hz, which did not correspond to the wingbeat or any other frequency that we have investigated. These regular oscillations are a predicted outcome of the multisensory negative feedback loop that we have proposed, and depends on the lag in the sensory acquisition ( Chatterjee et al, 2022 ), or its translation to motor commands in addition to the mechanical properties of head-neck apparatus. Alternatively, it may result from active head movements that the moth performs to ensure active visual feedback ( Cellini and Mongeau, 2020 ; Stamper et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In all the recordings of head stabilization, we observed small-amplitude head oscillations (or head wobble; Chatterjee et al, 2022 ) at approximately 12 Hz, which did not correspond to the wingbeat or any other frequency that we have investigated. These regular oscillations are a predicted outcome of the multisensory negative feedback loop that we have proposed, and depends on the lag in the sensory acquisition ( Chatterjee et al, 2022 ), or its translation to motor commands in addition to the mechanical properties of head-neck apparatus. Alternatively, it may result from active head movements that the moth performs to ensure active visual feedback ( Cellini and Mongeau, 2020 ; Stamper et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…All data are accessible at the following link: . Electronic supplementary material, figures S1–S3 accompany this paper [34].…”
Section: Data Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data are accessible at the following link: https:// data.mendeley.com/datasets/xndr5g45db/draft?a=1bb29b13-57fb-4ca6-9dd7-8db1cd903209. Electronic supplementary material, figures S1-S3 accompany this paper [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%