“…The most notable difference between the tethering process for the two architectures was that the surface attachment density of four-arm PEO-NH 2 was about 4−5 times greater than that of linear PEO-NH 2 at all times during the tethering process, indicating a higher tethering rate for the four-arm PEO-NH 2 . In the tethering process, diffusion of the polymer molecule to the surface rather than its chemical reaction with the surface is the rate-determining step. ,,,, Since rate of diffusion through solvent is inversely proportional to R g , four-arm PEO-NH 2 , with R g = 2.63 nm, would diffuse only 18% faster than linear PEO-NH 2 , with R g = 3.10 nm . Thus, the effect of polymer architecture, i.e., four-arm vs linear, on diffusion through the solvent is relatively minor, and the explanation of the dramatic increase in rate and surface attachment density must lie elsewhere.…”