2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2050-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Bowel Limb Lengths and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review

Abstract: There is currently no consensus on the combined length of small bowel that should be bypassed as biliopancreatic or alimentary limb for optimum results with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A number of different limb lengths exist, and there is significant variation in practice amongst surgeons. Inevitably, this means that some patients have too much small bowel bypassed and end up with malnutrition and others end up with a less effective operation. Lack of standardisation poses further problems with interpretation a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…e other issue about bariatric surgery is the intestinal bypassed length that causes fewer complications such as malabsorption and also acceptable weight loss. Studies have recommended different formulas for that [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e other issue about bariatric surgery is the intestinal bypassed length that causes fewer complications such as malabsorption and also acceptable weight loss. Studies have recommended different formulas for that [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study conducted by Mahawar et al, they presented that a bypass length of 100-200 cm has acceptable outcomes and few possible complications such as malabsorption [16], while in a study conducted by Carbajo et al, they assessed patients who had undergone MGB/OAGB with 250-300 cm bypass length and found malabsorption in 1.1% of them that was compatible with prevalence of protein malabsorption presented in other studies [14]. In a study conducted by Lee et al, they compared outcomes of MBG/OAGB surgery in which bypassed length was chosen based on patients' BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most commonly performed technique, the proximal RYGB, only the lengths of the alimentary (AL) and the biliopancreatic limbs (BPL) are defined and counted through, whereas the common channel remains of variable, unknown size. While AL of 100-150 cm and BPL of 45-85 cm are commonly used[30,34,35], there is ongoing debate about the delineation of optimal limb lengths. Nonetheless, this debate does not respect absorptive capacity of small bowel and even less its adaptation over time.…”
Section: Short Bowel Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] There are variations between the constructed limb lengths of RYGBPs described in the literature, and these are designed by the surgeon's preference. [7,8] Most surgeons create a restricted gastric pouch from which the alimentary limb (AL) (100-150 cm) follows to join the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) (usually 50-100 cm in length) to form the common limb. The remaining common limb (CL) length is of an indeterminate currently unknown is whether there is an impact of the total/bypassed bowel length on the incidence of complications and failure.…”
Section: Wwwmisjournalnetmentioning
confidence: 99%