2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small business groups enhance performance and promote stability, not expropriation. Evidence from French SMEs

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper investigates the influence that a firm's distance from control has on its performance, using balance sheet information and a unique data set on small business ownership. This study fills a gap in the empirical governance literature by investigating whether there is expropriation of minority shareholders in small business groups. Contrary to observations for large business groups, results show a positive relationship between the separation of control from ownership and firm performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Although prior research suggests that large and small family businesses may differ from each other (Hamelin ; Romano et al . ), more explicit evidence in this respect is required (see Figure , Point 4).…”
Section: Discussion and Promising Avenues For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Although prior research suggests that large and small family businesses may differ from each other (Hamelin ; Romano et al . ), more explicit evidence in this respect is required (see Figure , Point 4).…”
Section: Discussion and Promising Avenues For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an argument similar to that of Netter et al (2011), it has also been suggested that the popular wisdom about expropriation in family businesses and business group affiliated firms that have concentrated ownership is an artefact of sample selection. Hamelin (2011), for example, does not find any evidence of expropriation in small business groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the demand-for-funds side the following factors are thought to influence capital structures of SMEs: lack of economies of scale in SMEs' operations (Tether, 1998); lack of collateral (Fraser, 2004); inseparability of the owner's and company's financial position (Berger & Udell, 2006); lack of experience and know-how (Berger & Udell, 1998); limited human resources (Rašković et al, 2011); higher personal involvement and desire for control (Cosh & Hughes, 1994;Hamelin, 2011); pecking order theory (Hussain, Millman & Matlay, 2006;Beck, Demirgüç-Kunt & Maksimovic, 2008); lack of information and knowledge about existing financing sources (Fraser, 2004); lower involvement in various social networks (Vos et al, 2007); and different business objectives, compared to large profit and growth-driven companies (Vos et al, 2007;Curran, 1986;Hakim, 1989). As pointed out by Park, Lim & Koo (2008) there are conflicting views on the main reason for the existence of the SME suboptimal capital structures, with some emphasizing more the supply-of-funds side and others more the issues on the demand-for-funds side.…”
Section: Company Size As a Key Factor Affecting Capital Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%