2020
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2019.1709745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small damage of brain parenchyma reliably triggers spreading depolarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed the highly dynamic character of CSD-induced behavioral changes – an early brief period of enhanced grooming during CSD (40–80 sec), late post-CSD behavioral activation (300–420 sec), episodes of atypical behavior such as tremor, freezing and forced circling (100–300 sec). Similar behavioral changes, including grooming during CSD, episodes of freezing, circling and locomotor activation after CSD, have been described in other studies in awake rodents (10,29,30). The only change in spontaneous behavior, observed during CSD traveling over the neocortex in our study, was increased grooming, which is known to be associated with facial pain in rodents (31) and is produced by CGRP administration (32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our study showed the highly dynamic character of CSD-induced behavioral changes – an early brief period of enhanced grooming during CSD (40–80 sec), late post-CSD behavioral activation (300–420 sec), episodes of atypical behavior such as tremor, freezing and forced circling (100–300 sec). Similar behavioral changes, including grooming during CSD, episodes of freezing, circling and locomotor activation after CSD, have been described in other studies in awake rodents (10,29,30). The only change in spontaneous behavior, observed during CSD traveling over the neocortex in our study, was increased grooming, which is known to be associated with facial pain in rodents (31) and is produced by CGRP administration (32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Comparison of spontaneous behavior after sham stimulation (n = 14) and a single unilateral CSD (n = 13) has shown significant enhancement of grooming during CSD (40–80 sec) and remote post-CSD (300–420 sec) behavioral activation (Figure 6). In addition to these changes in general behavior, atypical behavioral patterns were observed following CSD (Figure 6): Behavioral arrest (freezing-like episodes) with or without tremor (100–280 sec) and forced circling to the side contralateral to CSD (140–280 sec) heralded CSD penetration into the striatum, as we reported previously (10). The abnormal behavioral patterns were time-locked with the observed post-CSD hemispheric disconnection (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mere presence of the cannulas might lead to inflammatory reactions of the surrounding tissue, which might even be exaggerated by the mechanical and psychological stress of daily injections. Recently it was shown that the insertion of an injection needle through a guide cannula into the BLA was sufficient to trigger the occurrence of an acute spreading depolarization that in turn caused freezing behavior and lasted for 1.5 min after the initial insult 58 . In addition, BLA lesions have been specifically associated with decreased mutual-reward choices in the PCT 14 and do interfere with general reward learning in multiple ways (reviewed in Wassum and Izquierdo 59 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%