“…Such knots are fibered, and in [BLSY21, §2] we gave a partial characterization of their possible monodromies; more recently, Farber, Reinoso, and Wang [FRW22, Corollary 1.8] used this to show that K is necessarily T (2, 5). We remark that if we wanted to work over Z/2Z rather than Q, then we could finish the proof that K = T (2, 5) without recourse to [FRW22], using instead the arguments in [BLSY21]. Now if Kh(K; Z/2Z) is 5-dimensional and supported in the δ-grading σ = −2, then we apply the above to its mirror K to conclude that K = T (2, 5), and hence that K = T (−2, 5).…”