2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.02874
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Dehn surgery and SU(2)

John A. Baldwin,
Zhenkun Li,
Steven Sivek
et al.

Abstract: We prove that the fundamental group of 3-surgery on a nontrivial knot in S 3 always admits an irreducible SU (2)-representation. This answers a question of Kronheimer and Mrowka dating from their work on the Property P conjecture. An important ingredient in our proof is a relationship between instanton Floer homology and the symplectic Floer homology of genus-2 surface diffeomorphisms, due to Ivan Smith. We use similar arguments at the end to extend our main result to infinitely many surgery slopes in the inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such knots are fibered, and in [BLSY21, §2] we gave a partial characterization of their possible monodromies; more recently, Farber, Reinoso, and Wang [FRW22, Corollary 1.8] used this to show that K is necessarily T (2, 5). We remark that if we wanted to work over Z/2Z rather than Q, then we could finish the proof that K = T (2, 5) without recourse to [FRW22], using instead the arguments in [BLSY21]. Now if Kh(K; Z/2Z) is 5-dimensional and supported in the δ-grading σ = −2, then we apply the above to its mirror K to conclude that K = T (2, 5), and hence that K = T (−2, 5).…”
Section: The Figure Eight and The Cinquefoilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such knots are fibered, and in [BLSY21, §2] we gave a partial characterization of their possible monodromies; more recently, Farber, Reinoso, and Wang [FRW22, Corollary 1.8] used this to show that K is necessarily T (2, 5). We remark that if we wanted to work over Z/2Z rather than Q, then we could finish the proof that K = T (2, 5) without recourse to [FRW22], using instead the arguments in [BLSY21]. Now if Kh(K; Z/2Z) is 5-dimensional and supported in the δ-grading σ = −2, then we apply the above to its mirror K to conclude that K = T (2, 5), and hence that K = T (−2, 5).…”
Section: The Figure Eight and The Cinquefoilsmentioning
confidence: 99%