“…More importantly, had population growth truly been the main cause, we would not have seen the heightened state of inequality in landownership over the years. Many researchers, as well as the World Bank, report a higher concentration of landownership among big landowners in rural areas of Bangladesh, which they argue has led to a polarization within the landholding agrarian classes (Jannuzi and Peach ; Rahman ; Rahman ; World Bank ). These researchers attribute the fragmentation of farm sizes to this polarization of landownership.…”
Section: The State As the Mediator Between Capitalist Expansion And Amentioning
This paper focuses on three decades of agrarian reform policies and the resulting peculiarity of the development trajectory in Bangladesh. I interrogate the ways in which the reforms have led to a paradoxical situation consisting of partial protelarianization in attempting to promote a marketbased economy. I contend that the particular positioning of the state is central to understanding this dialectic between proletarianization and the persistence of small peasants amid a huge rush towards the formation of a capitalist market economy. I conclude that the partial nature of agrarian transformation that we now experience in Bangladesh may not be resolved in favour of a complete proletarianization of small peasants in the foreseeable future.
“…More importantly, had population growth truly been the main cause, we would not have seen the heightened state of inequality in landownership over the years. Many researchers, as well as the World Bank, report a higher concentration of landownership among big landowners in rural areas of Bangladesh, which they argue has led to a polarization within the landholding agrarian classes (Jannuzi and Peach ; Rahman ; Rahman ; World Bank ). These researchers attribute the fragmentation of farm sizes to this polarization of landownership.…”
Section: The State As the Mediator Between Capitalist Expansion And Amentioning
This paper focuses on three decades of agrarian reform policies and the resulting peculiarity of the development trajectory in Bangladesh. I interrogate the ways in which the reforms have led to a paradoxical situation consisting of partial protelarianization in attempting to promote a marketbased economy. I contend that the particular positioning of the state is central to understanding this dialectic between proletarianization and the persistence of small peasants amid a huge rush towards the formation of a capitalist market economy. I conclude that the partial nature of agrarian transformation that we now experience in Bangladesh may not be resolved in favour of a complete proletarianization of small peasants in the foreseeable future.
“…Bangladeshi economists studying the land market have never raised this as an issue, but they have identified a very different analytical question. Despite the Bangladeshi land market being very active, there is no systematic evidence over time of land getting concentrated in any particular size category (van Schendel 1982;Bhaduri et al 1986;Mahbub Ullah 1996;Rahman 1986Rahman , 1988Pandian 1987;M.M. Khan 1987;Feldman and McCarthy 1987).…”
Section: Land Rights and Agrarian Constraints In Bangladeshmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.